How much of an effect do high gasoline prices have upon the rate of layoffs in the U.S. economy?

Today, following the initial confirmation of our hypothesis that they do have a significant effect as measured by the number of new jobless claims filed every week, we're going to attempt to quantify how big an impact that high gasoline prices has upon the employee retention decisions of U.S. employers.

We define "high gasoline prices" as being when the national average price of a gallon of regular unleaded gasoline in the United States rises above $3.50 per gallon, in terms of 2011-12 U.S. dollars. This price level appears to be significant in affecting both the spending of U.S. consumers, who respond by cutting back their spending on other goods and services, and the cost of doing business for U.S. employers, who face higher fuel and transportation costs, both directly and indirectly through their supply chains.



Residual Distribution for Seasonally-Adjusted Initial Unemployment Insurance Claims, 26 March 2011 - 28 July 2012

Previously, we've observed that whenever the national average price of gasoline crosses this level, the number of seasonally-adjusted initial unemployment insurance claims that are filed each week is affected some two to three weeks later. If it rises above the $3.50 per gallon mark, we observe an upward shift in the number of new jobless claims being filed and if it falls below it, we observe a downward shift in the number of new jobless claims being filed each week.

1
Political  Calculations

Political Calculations

Political Calculations is a site that develops, applies and presents both established and cutting edge theory to the topics of investing, business and economics.

Be the first to read Political Calculation's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Most Recent Articles

Join the Debate
7 Comments So Far
PhillupSpace2 Wrote: Aug 13, 2012 7:03 PM
This article seems to deal with the expected increase on jobless claims due to the price of fuel.

It is a good point but does not address the total jobless increase I expect is looming out there.
It is generally believed that States have a limit of their financial experiments because they, unlike the Federal government, cannot print money. That is deceiving!

Just look at the most recent history where California counties and cities completely forgot who they were supposed to be trying to get the best deal for! Instead of trying to get the most and best services for the least cost, they rollewd over to favor the few who's unions gave them things; they, in return, gave the employees things! Money runs out, layoffs looming!
PhillupSpace2 Wrote: Aug 13, 2012 7:17 PM
But the balancing function is not allowed to work. In comes the vote/campaign cash hungry Obama administrations thumb on the scales! By tyhe time all the shuffeling and sleight- of- hand was done, they had, through various maneuvers, passed to the state of California, almost 90 Billion dollars without a single demand for future repayment! This kept the bloated, overcompensated public sector going for a while longer.

But, like Clinton's 200 cops on the street, that relief came to an end, the anesthetic wore off, and the migrane returned!

Now comes the day of reckoning and city and county deadwood will hit the unemployment line. The above article did not address that!
FairnessMan Wrote: Aug 13, 2012 4:05 PM
Let's get those gas prices up to at least $5.00 per gallon and the BS government unemployment rate up to about 15%, but only until Nov.6th.
Donald581 Wrote: Aug 13, 2012 12:55 PM
In California we have the Diamond lane, which a vehicle must have 2 passengers to be allowed
to use it to pass the slow traffic. with the gas prices out of control small bossiness have their delivery trucks to offer FREE rides so they can use the Diamond lane. When the lane ends and converges with the slow lanes it is slower yet because trucks DO not accelerate as fast as cars. So the HIGH GAS prices make us burn more gas because of the slow-down. As usual The Arab Buddies of Obama get to stick it to us some more. VOTE Anti-Incumbent across the board, both party's. Congress has 100 years to get it right but instead became Millionaires.
rpm Wrote: Aug 13, 2012 5:58 PM
We have 546 people in this country that pretty much determine this stuff. 435 House + 100 Senate + 9 SCOTUS + POTUS + VPOTUS.

If this wants war, we go to war. If they don't, we don't. If they want inflation, we have inflation. If they want a balanced budget, we have one, if they don't, we don't.

The State of CA collects a per gallon tax on every gallon of gas sold, and a sales tax on top of that. A decrease in the amount of gas sold would hit the State in the pocket. The State has an incentive for us to burn more gas--hence the silly Diamond lanes, red lights that stop you at 3AM with no traffic for miles, etc. etc. The MTBE fiasco--and the ethanol fiasco.
Greg1084 Wrote: Aug 13, 2012 7:23 PM
Voting anti-incumbent in California is a safe bet most of the time. If I do it where I live we would just put the Bozos back in office that caused all this to start with--vote Rep or Lib on everything.
kenneth416 Wrote: Aug 13, 2012 10:39 AM
While this article shows some correlation between high gasoline prices and new jobless claims, there are many other factors which are ignored (time of year, European difficulties, China slow-down, stage of election process, etc.). Thus, I would not put too much stock in these findings.