By Stratfor

U.S. President Barack Obama asked for direct talks with Iran in a letter to Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to Ali Motahari, an Iranian lawmaker and member of the Majlis National Security and Foreign Policy Committee. In an interview Wednesday with Iran's semi-official Fars News Agency, Motahari said the first half of the letter consisted of threats laying out actions that would be taken if Tehran crossed the "red line" of closing the energy-vital Strait of Hormuz; the second half included a request from Obama for direct talks with Iran. The official spokesman for Iran's Foreign Ministry, Ramin Mehmanparast, confirmed that the letter had been received and added that Iran was deliberating a response. 

News of the supposedly secret letter first emerged last Friday, when The New York Times reported that the Obama administration was relying on a secret channel of communication to warn the supreme leader of Iran of the consequences of crossing the line in threatening the Strait of Hormuz. Two days later, Iranian media quoted Mehmanparast as confirming receipt of the U.S. letter. He also clarified the channels through which the letter was disseminated: Susan Rice, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, delivered the missive to her Iranian counterpart, Mohammad Khazaee. The Swiss ambassador to Tehran, Livia Leu Agosti, and Iraqi President Jalal Talabani also conveyed a similar message to the Iranian leadership, according to Mehmanparsat.

An Unlikely Appeal

1
George Friedman

George Friedman

George Friedman is the CEO and chief intelligence officer of Stratfor, a private intelligence company located in Austin, TX.

Most Recent Articles

Join the Debate
26 Comments So Far
« Previous1Next »
mynameisLegion Wrote: Jan 22, 2012 11:08 PM
The Lord is my shephard, I crave vast amounts of consumer goods, as I am a materialist.

I fear no evil for the baggers and the birthers are evil.

He leadeth me to social engineering in far-away places, and nation building in foreign countries.

He restoreth Big government Republicanism when the chance comes.

He leadeth me to get my Republican "teat suck" when the chance arrives.
mynameisLegion Wrote: Jan 22, 2012 3:26 PM
Republicans say this about Obama and the Reverend Wright; "I have a hard time believing a man would stay in a church for 20 years without agreeing with the pastor's beliefs."

I asked, "Did Obama get anything else out of that 20 year relationship other than what Wright expressed in the oft-shown clip of him damming America?"

The Republican says "NO!"

Shouldn't the same logic be applied to Roman Catholicism where pedophile priests have been endlessly shuffled from one community to the next? Didn't that church systemically pass pedophile priests from a suspecting parish to an unsuspecting parish for decades?

Didn't Cardinal Bernard Law, a shuffler of pedophile priests get promoted to the Vatican?
RG_From_THP Wrote: Jan 22, 2012 4:14 PM
mynameisLegion a.k.a. Sybil a.k.a. Ray Ancle is a mentally ill person who is employed by the Barack Obama Administration at the Internal Revenue Service.

mynameisLegion a.k.a. Sybil a.k.a. Ray Ancle wants Obama elected and taxes raised for his own personal job security.

mynameisLegion a.k.a. Sybil a.k.a. Ray Ancle has lived 'Off' the Government in some form or other for many Years and has a 'Twisted' vested interest in the re-election of Barack Obama.
Steve1928 Wrote: Jan 22, 2012 3:12 PM
I just can't see any good come from talks, back-door or otherwise. As long as Iran labels us, the U.S., as the "Great Satan", and espouses the destruction of Israel, talk with them is impossible. The only thing they understand is that if they cross a line, it'll rain smart bombs. They are playing us, and Obama is making us look weak.
Blair31 Wrote: Jan 22, 2012 3:02 PM
mynameisLegion Wrote: Jan 22, 2012 2:20 PM
Many Republicans say this about divorce, "While I hate divorce and wish people would stop entering into it so casually, the reality is that divorce is allowed for in the Bible."

According to Jesus asks I? Jesus says a man and a woman become one upon marriage and NO man can undo what GOD has joined together. These people are placing divorce decrees by judges above GOD.

And what New Testament verse allows one to re-marry after divorce again, and again....
david176 Wrote: Jan 22, 2012 1:18 PM
I suggest that they buy-off our representitives as the Israeli's do with the help of traitors amonst us.
Paulus Textor Wrote: Jan 22, 2012 10:37 AM
As Winston Churchill said, "jaw-jaw" is much preferable to "war-war." It's amazing that otherwise-sensible people see some dark danger in simply TALKING to a foreign power. Merely talking does not mean you give up anything; it just means you talk.

Talking, however, is very, very dangerous to people who have an agenda of war-at-all-costs. Talking tends to defuse the drive to war. This is why the neoconservatives, bent on "benevolent world hegemony" (their term, not mine), are dead set against talking.
Jay Wye Wrote: Jan 22, 2012 11:13 AM
the Iranians know that they can delay any action by the US just by talking and talking and talking,just like the Palestinians do. While the talks go on,their nuclear program steadily advances. They don't intend that anything be achieved by the "talks",except for the delay.
Jay Wye Wrote: Jan 22, 2012 11:18 AM
it was the same as during the "talks" or "negotiations" over nuclear fuel rods for Iran's reactor;Iran talked,but never intended to use fuel rods from outside Iran,even with Russian guarantees.

but they did get a lot of delay time. and kept enriching uranium all the time.
Paulus Textor Wrote: Jan 22, 2012 5:02 PM
Sorry, Jay, but you are completely wrong.

Neither you nor anyone else has ever produced a shred of evidence that Iran has any nuclear weapons program whatsoever.

They do have a nuclear POWER program, which is entirely their right, as a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

There has never been the slightest evidence of any diversion of nuclear materials from Iran's completely-legal nuclear power program, to any clandestine weapons program.
Jay Wye Wrote: Jan 22, 2012 9:15 PM
yeah,stay in denial.
even the IAEA admits they cannot certify that Iran is not working on nuclear weapons. they can't even monitor Iran's nuclear installations.Many were built before IAEA was even notified of them,a clear violation of the NPT.So they were unable to install cameras and monitoring equipment.
And if you think the US and allies are going to reveal their sources inside Iran,you're REALLY delusional.

You just don't know what you're talking about.
Jay Wye Wrote: Jan 22, 2012 9:17 PM
Oh,and IAEA has found traces of uranium enriched FAR above what Iran needs for any of it's reactors and above what Iran has disclosed to the IAEA.

You miss SO much.
ApolloSpeaks18 Wrote: Jan 22, 2012 10:29 AM
The Iranians are scared silly over a Republican in the White House next year and will do what they can to make Obama look good for Election Day.
Blair31 Wrote: Jan 22, 2012 9:40 AM
LIAR, LIAR, PANTS ON FIRE!
Joe 145 Wrote: Jan 22, 2012 7:53 AM
I have an idea: Why doesn't President Obama make a deal with Iran, and after it is completed, WE can find out what it is. Maybe we can sell them some of our government debt.

Sorry, I am finding it difficult to find anything good for the United States in any of this.
vietnamvet Wrote: Jan 22, 2012 12:23 PM
Are you talking about an exceedingly complicated agreement, addressing many areas of interest, and costing trillions to enact?

Would this be an agreement which would have to be passed before we could find out what was in the agreement?

That seems similar to past actions of this administration, and that probably makes it all on the up and up ... wouldn't you say?
david176 Wrote: Jan 20, 2012 12:21 PM
Maybe Iran can buy into our government as the Israeli's do. Goyim anyone?
Blair31 Wrote: Jan 20, 2012 11:51 AM
The only way that would happen is if Iran could build its own aircraft carriers. Britain, Japan, and the
United States, succeeded. Germany, on the other hand, failed.
jb168 Wrote: Jan 20, 2012 9:56 AM
So, Iran's getting a nuclear weapon is not crossing a red line? Say what?
bob sledd Wrote: Jan 20, 2012 5:14 PM
Great point...I thiught "that"was "the" red line, no?
RG_From_THP Wrote: Jan 20, 2012 7:33 AM
Meet the 'Blame America Team' - Ron Paul and Barack Obama.

Ron Paul thinks Iran should have Nuclear Weapons.

http://thpatriots.blogspot.com/2012/01/blame-america-team.html
« Previous1Next »