Listening to the television talk show pundits this past Sunday, including Austan Goolsbee (one of Obama’s failed economists), and George Will (one of the right’s senior statesman), I find myself in a difficult position.
My predicament is agreeing with the current actions of Standard & Poor’s, and also defending their actions during the credit crisis of 2008. (Has it ever really ended?)
Beginning in 2006, I wrote, lectured, and blitzed the radio airwaves with the ultimate impact of the financial engineered mortgage market.
I discussed CDOs, CDSs, and even SIVs (most people thought these were used to drain pasta.)
I took public information, thought wildly out of the box, made assumptions based on what-if premises, and viewed government, Wall Street, and even the media as all participating in the biggest bank heist of all time. (Should you like to read or hear any of these past radio shows or writings, they’re all available at billtatro.com.)
In addition, at the risk of my own personal financial advisory career, I directed clients to get liquid, invest in assets non-correlated to the stock market, and short housing and financials.
For a while, it didn’t look good. Housing spin machines, government press conferences, and all sorts of market machinations worked to keep the markets up. However, economics ultimately won as it always does, and my thesis was proven correct.
Standard & Poor’s is currently being vilified because they were wrong in 2008, so they must be wrong now.
In fact, the White House and their cronies would have you believe the S&P made a $2 trillion math error, and thus the downgrade should be dismissed.
Let’s first examine the triple A rating for subprime mortgage paper in 2008.
Let me make myself perfectly clear. Some will contend S&P was bought off, and gave triple A to the highest bidder. (I’ll let history judge that accusation.)
I tend to believe the data provided by Fannie and Freddie, the administration, the bankers, and even the Treasury and Federal Reserve was so slanted to a positive outcome that a triple A rating was inevitable.
There was no reason to believe differently. The pressure from politicians like Barney Frank and Chris Dodd must have been enormous, as were the so-called brilliant minds of Goldman Sachs that built models to prove that success was not only a given, but was designed to go on as long as the eye could see. (Or, as they say on Star Trek “Going where no man has gone before.”)
In Other News: Bi-Partisan Agreement that Debbie Wasserman Schultz is a Horrible Person | Michael Schaus
In Other News: State Department Covers Up for Hillary – Asks IRS How to Destroy Hard-Drives | Michael Schaus