The Federal Reserve’s Massive Theft Of Stability

|
Posted: Jul 14, 2021 9:40 AM
The Federal Reserve’s Massive Theft Of Stability

Source: AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta

Economists George Selgin, William Lastrapes, and Lawrence White do not tell an encouraging story about the Federal Reserve[1] They noted, ”In light of the severe Great Contraction of the early 1930s under the Fed’s watch, worse than any of the pre-Fed panics, […] continuing the pre-Fed status quo would have had better results.”[2]

In fact, according to Austrian economist, Robert Wenzel, since the Federal Reserve was established, money supply has increased by 12,230 percent; consumer prices have increased by 2,242 percent; and eighteen recessions have occurred. Among these recessions is the Great Depression (1930s) and the recent Great Recession (2007 – present).[3] This is not a good track record by any standard; nor, as we will see, an improvement from the pre-Fed era.

Actually the pre-Fed economy was much better than even previously realized. Several studies reveal that the “panics” of the 1800s were much less severe and shorter in length than formerly reported. Many of the reported recessions of that time, in fact, did not exist.  .

While the economy did, at times, slow down, which is a normal economic function; it did not, as previously believed, turn downward. And mitigating these downturns or panics was one of the very reasons for establishing the Federal Reserve. So, unfortunately, the very reason for the Federal Reserve did not even exist or, at a minimum, was not nearly a significant issue as to need an entity as the Federal Reserve; that is, a central banking system.

“[T]he proportion of the time that the U.S. industrial sector has spent in recession has remained fairly constant over the past two centuries. The characteristics of industrial contractions, expansions, and peak-to-peak cycles appear largely unchanged among the pre-Civil War, Civil War to World War I, and postwar periods,”[4] notes economist Joseph Davis. In fact, in 1926 economist William Thorp reported that “[t]he earliest recorded depression in America came in New England in 1640, and followed a period of ten years of rapid growth.”[5]

[1] See the entirety of George Selgin, William D. Lastrapes, and Lawrence H. White, December 2010, “Has the Fed Been a Failure?” (Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute).

[2] George Selgin, William D. Lastrapes, and Lawrence H. White, December 2010, “Has the Fed Been a Failure?” (Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute), p. 37.

[3] Robert Wenzel, April 25, 2012, “Speech delivered at the New York Federal Reserve Bank” Economic Policy Journal.com, (New York, NY: Speech delivered on April 25, 2012 in the Liberty Room of the New York Federal Reserve Bank), [http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2012/04/my-speech-delivered-at-new-york-federal.html].  Also see Robert Wenzel, April 30, 2012, “New York Fed: Leave the Building!” Mises Daily, (Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute), [http://mises.org/daily/6028/New-York-Fed-Leave-the-Building].

[4] Joseph H. Davis, March 2006, “An Improved Annual Chronology of U.S. Business Cycles since the 1790s,” The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 117-119.

[5] William Long Thorp, 1926, Business Annals, (New York, NY: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.), p. 112.