Three cheers for a group of nine California students who are fed up with tenure rules that protect not only incompetent teachers, but also sexual predators.
Reuters reports California students challenge teacher employment rules in lawsuit.
A group of nine California students will challenge employment rules they complain force public schools in the most populous U.S. state to retain low performing teachers, as opening arguments kick off on Monday in a lawsuit over education policy.
The lawsuit seeks to overturn five California statutes that set guidelines for permanent employment, firing and layoff practices for K-12 public school teachers, saying the rules violate the constitutional rights of students by denying them effective teachers.
Among the rules targeted by the lawsuit is one that requires school administrators to either grant or deny tenure status to teachers after the first 18 months of their employment, which they complain causes administrators to hastily give permanent employment to potentially problematic teachers.
"The system is dysfunctional and arbitrary due to these outdated laws that handcuff school administrators from operating in a fashion that protects children and their right to quality education," attorney Theodore Boutrous of the education advocacy group Students Matter said in a media call.
The plaintiffs are also challenging three laws they say make it difficult to fire low-performing tenured teachers by requiring years of documentation, dozens of procedural steps and hundreds of thousands in public funds before a dismissal.
Lastly, the plaintiffs want to abolish the so-called "last-in first-out" statute, which requires administrators to lay off teachers based on reverse seniority.
The group says that the layoff policy disproportionately affects minority and low-income students, who are more likely to have entry-level teachers and poor quality senior teachers assigned to their district.
"When the layoffs come, the more junior teachers are laid off first, which ends up leaving a higher proportion what we call the ‘grossly ineffective' teachers," Boutrous said. "It's really a vicious cycle."
Teachers' Union Response
"We don't think stripping teachers of their workplace professional rights will help students," said California Federation of Teachers President Joshua Pechthalt."
Mish Translation of Teachers' Union Response
Testimony Started Monday
The lawsuit was filed by the nonprofit advocacy group Students Matter, which contends education laws are a violation of the Constitution's equal protection guarantee because they do not ensure all students have access to an adequate education.
The LA Times reports Testimony begins in trial over California teachers' job protections.
Arguments begin Monday in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of laws that govern California’s teacher tenure rules, seniority policies and the dismissal process -- an overhaul of which could upend controversial job security for instructors.
The lawsuit, filed by the nonprofit advocacy group Students Matter, contends these education laws are a violation of the Constitution's equal protection guarantee because they do not ensure all students have access to an adequate education.
Vergara vs. California, filed on behalf of nine students and their families in Los Angeles County Superior Court, seeks to revamp a dismissal process the plaintiffs say is too costly and time consuming, lengthen the time period for instructors to gain tenure and dismantle the "last hired, first fired" policies that fail to consider teacher effectiveness.
The lawsuit aims to protect the rights of students, teachers and school districts against a "gross disparity" in educational opportunity, lawyers for the plaintiffs said.
Many students — overwhelmingly those who are minority and low-income — are destined to suffer from ineffective and unequal instruction because administrators are unable to remove ineffective teachers from schools, attorneys said.
Students Matter was founded by Silicon Valley entrepreneur David F. Welch, a research scientist who went on to co-found Infinera, a manufacturer of optical telecommunications systems based in Sunnyvale, Calif. The group is partly funded by organizations known for battling teachers unions. The foundation of Los Angeles philanthropist Eli Broad, which has backed numerous education initiatives, also supports it.
Gross Lie of the Day
In the gross lie of the day category, "The California Department of Education contends districts have the opportunity and discretion to remove ineffective teachers from classrooms and decide whether to grant tenure."
In contrast, L.A. schools Supt. John Deasy, is a supporter of the effort to repeal the statutes. He declined to comment because he is a witness in the case.
Lay it on them John!
Unions are the Child Molester's Best Friend
I am quite sure Deasy can testify how hard it is to get rid of incompetent teachers, even child molesters.
If you think I am making this up, sadly, I am not.
I highly recommend reading the LA Times report: Failure Gets a Pass L.A. Unified Pays Teachers Not to Teach.
You can find similar articles about New York, in fact, anywhere unions rule.
Every time I write something like this I get a ton of emails from teachers. Surprisingly, about a third of them are in support of what I say.
In Praise of Teachers
I have said this before and I say it again: I have nothing against teachers. Most of them are dedicated, hard-working professionals.
I do have everything against public unions whose sole mission is to collect dues and coerce legislators into laws written for the union at the expense of the kids.
Mike "Mish" Shedlock
Read more at http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2014/01/california-students-file-constitutional.html#vIAldz896lZ3ob33.99
Welcome to John Ransom’s Stocks in the News where the headlines meet the trendlines:
Stock number one: Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd.
Freescale shares jump on strong 4Q results- Associated Press
Shares of Freescale Semiconductor jumped 16 percent Wednesday after it posted an adjusted fourth-quarter profit and issued bold revenue guidance for this quarter. Pacific Crest Securities' Michael McConnell backed an "Outperform" rating on the company, saying that while debt levels remain very high, it's making progress in boosting revenue and profitability..
Trailing PE NA; Forward PE: 10.20
Estimate Trend: Down
Ransom Note Trendline: Avoid Freescale
Stock number two: CommVault Systems, Inc.
Commvault Systems beats by $0.10, beats on revs- Briefing.com
Reports Q3 (Dec) earnings of $0.54 per share, $0.10 better than the Capital IQ Consensus Estimate of $0.44; revenues rose 19.7% year/year to $153.3 mln vs the $149.1 mln consensus.
Trailing PE: 56 Forward PE: 34
Estimate Trend: Steady
Ransom Note Trendline: Avoid Commvault
Stock number three: Ezcorp
Why Ezcorp (EZPW) Is Surging Today- The Street.com
Ezcorp(EZPW_) was soaring 22.25% to $11.43 shortly after noon on Wednesday after the pawn shop operator announced first-quarter earnings per share that exceeded analysts' expectations. The company reported adjusted earnings of 49 cents per share in the quarter that ended Dec. 31, which surpassed analysts' expectations of 39 cents a share. Ezcorp also reported revenue dropped 1% to $269.4 million from $272.7 million in the same period one year earlier, though this still beat analysts' expectations of $257.5 million.
Trailing PE: 19; Forward PE: 6
Estimate Trend: Up
Ransom Note Trendline: Avoid Ezcorp
So at $40 a ticket let’s say. Multiplied by 70,000. That’s 2.8 million bucks taken from Maryland motorists by the state which should not have been taken. I’m guessing no one has sent out any refunds either.
As we have documented multiple times speed and red light cameras are often a scam with contractors getting as much as 50% of the revenue from issued tickets.
Consider this – 2 years ago I supposedly ran a red light in the Bronx trying to find my way back to I- 95. 2 weeks later I got a ticket in the mail issued by a robot. The camera was run by a robot. In order to keep New York City happy I paid what essentially was a robot. No human being was even aware of my infraction – unless I didn’t pay. There’s something wrong with that.
The administration has one good reason not to release the report: it doesn’t want to get sued.
Despite calls from the City Council to release the audit, the administration does not plan to do so, Harris said. City Solicitor George Nilson, the administration’s chief lawyer, has said releasing the audit would violate a settlement agreement with Xerox and “create obvious risks and potential exposure for the city.”
In the settlement, the city agreed to pay Xerox $2.3 million for invoices from late 2012. The city also agreed to keep confidential any documents “referring or relating to, or reflecting, each party’s internal considerations, discussions, analyses, and/or evaluations of issues raised during the settlement discussions.”
The documents are no longer “confidential” at this point (and can be viewed here), and what’s been uncovered may cause future problems for Xerox, which was selected by a city panel last year to take over Chicago’s traffic cams. This happened in August of 2013, after Baltimore had already cut the contractor loose, but well before URS’ report surfaced. Knowing it had buried the company’s ineptitude by contractually obligating Baltimore’s administration to keep its mouth shut, Xerox officials had the confidence to make the following claim when reached for comment last August:
Xerox officials have said the problems in Baltimore accounted for less than 1 percent of all the tickets issued there.
Read more at Against Crony Capitalism.com
Proving that neither party really wants to do anything about escalating costs of anything, in typical D.C. compromise action, the House Passes $956B Farm Bill in a bipartisan vote.
Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), and Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.), and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) all voted for the bill.
Democrats are howling over miniscule cuts in SNAP (food stamps). For example, an inane headline on the Daily Koz reads House passes food stamp-slashing farm bill.
Supposedly there will be $8.6 billion in devastating food stamp cuts. Even if that happens it is less than a 1% cut in an economy that is supposedly in recovery.
Contrary to Popular Belief, No Cuts in Food Stamps
Will there be any cuts? I rather doubt it. In the "too stupid to make up category", this is how they determined the cuts.
The bill finds $8.6 billion in savings by requiring households to receive at least $20 per year in home heating assistance before they automatically qualify for food stamps, instead of the $1 threshold now in place in some states.
Now what do you think will happen? If you can't figure it out, I will tell you. States will give $20 per year in home heating assistance to everyone currently getting $1 per year in annual home heating assistance.
There will be miniscule (if any) savings at all at the federal level, and small increases at the state level.
Crop Subsidies Preserved
Next consider House passes farm bill, crop subsidies preserved.
After more than two years of partisan squabbles over food and farm policy, the House passed and sent to the Senate Wednesday an almost $100 billion-a-year, compromise farm bill containing a small cut in food stamps and preserving most crop subsidies.
The measure, which the House approved 251-166, had solid backing from the Republican leadership team, even though it makes smaller cuts to food stamps than they would have liked. The bill would cut about $800 million a year from the $80 billion-a-year program, or around 1 percent. The House had sought a 5 percent cut.
The legislation also would continue to heavily subsidize major crops for the nation’s farmers while eliminating some subsidies and shifting them toward more politically defensible insurance programs.
House Agriculture Chairman Frank Lucas, R-Okla., who has been working on the bill since 2011, called the compromise a “miracle” after years of setbacks.
For those seeking reform of farm programs, the legislation would eliminate a $4.5 billion-a-year farm subsidy called direct payments, which are paid to farmers whether they farm or not. But the bill nonetheless would continue to heavily subsidize major crops — corn, soybeans, wheat, rice and cotton — while shifting many of those subsidies toward more politically defensible insurance programs. That means farmers would have to incur losses before they could get a payout.
It is beyond idiotic to call this do-nothing compromise a "miracle". It's a do-nothing bill for which D.C. is famous.
It would have been a miracle had there been any real cuts.
Actual CBO Estimated Savings
The facts speak for themselves.
In spite of the trumped up $8.6 billion in savings in food stamps and smaller savings on farm subsidies, "The bill would save around $1.65 billion annually overall, according to the Congressional Budget Office."
Assuming the CBO is correct, the actual savings on the bill is $1.65 billion out of $956 billion. In percentage terms (drum roll please) .... the devastating cutbacks amount to 0.17%!
Oh! The Horror!
Republicans and Democrats alike should both be ashamed, not only for doing virtually nothing, but also for howling at the moon as if they did.
Mike "Mish" Shedlock
Read more at http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/#wYQM8iHCJbdPjhD1.99
Welcome to John Ransom’s Stocks in the News where the headlines meet the trendlines for January 28th:
Stock number one: Rent-A-Center, Inc..
Rent-A-Center plunges after 'most challenging December in years' dings profit- Fly on the Wall
Rent-to-own operator Rent-A-Center (RCII) is one of today's losers after the company's fourth quarter results and fiscal 2014 profit guidance fell significantly below expectations. WHAT'S NEW: Last night, Rent-A-Center reported fourth quarter earnings per share of 25c and revenue of $769.6M, compared to analysts' consensus estimates of 75c and $787.95M, respectively. Same-store sales declined 1.1% for the company in the quarter.
Trailing PE 8.64; Forward PE: 7.27
Estimate Trend: Down
Ransom Note Trendline: Sell Rent-A-Center
Stock number two: VimpelCom Ltd.
Russian mobile firm Vimpelcom slashes dividend, spooking investors
Vimpelcom, Russia's third biggest mobile operator, said it would slash its dividend to pay down debt piled up in an aggressive expansion drive, marking an unexpected policy shift that spooked shareholders. Vimpelcom's expansion into Africa, Asia and continental Europe left the group with more than $20 billion in debt, according to its latest quarterly results.
Trailing PE: 8.42 Forward PE: 8.57
Dividend: 7.8% from 13.7%
Estimate Trend: Down
Ransom Note Trendline: Sell Vimpelcom
Stock number three: Corning Inc.
Corning Shares Slide on Forecast for Price Drop in LCD Screens - Fly on the Wall
Corning Inc. (GLW) tumbled the most in more than a year after projecting price declines for LCD, the display technology used in televisions and computer monitors.
Corning shares fell 6.1 percent to $17.11 at 12:05 p.m. in New York. The stock had dropped as much as 9.2 percent earlier in the day, the most since October 2012. After gaining 41 percent in 2013, Corning had been up 2.2 percent this year through yesterday.
Trailing PE: 14.21; Forward PE: 11.28
Estimate Trend: Down
Ransom Note Trendline: Avoid Corning
I grew up in Virginia Beach, the largest beach town in America, and I think guards there make something in the $10-$15/hr range. If that.
I am giving the California life guards a bit of a hard time. Surf rescue can be a deadly serious business and there is quite a lot of responsibility associated with the job. Lord knows these guys do more work than a lot of administrators back in City Hall who are probably paid even more. But retiring at 50 with a $100K pension? Can’t go for that.
Newport Beach’s wealth masks the municipality’s self-inflicted fiscal problems, said Orange County Supervisor John Moorlach, a former county treasurer whose district includes the city. Full-time lifeguards hired before November 2012 are eligible to retire with full pensions when they turn 50. The city has the highest per-capita unfunded liability among Orange County’s 34 municipalities, Moorlach said. Eight city lifeguard managers made more than $100,000 in 2012, according to compensation data on state Controller John Chiang’s website. In all, 357 of the city’s 1,234 employees were paid more than $100,000 that year, the data show.
For more see Against Crony Capitalism.org
Several people sent me emails regarding a economic pending bust in Singapore.
Given that it's easy enough to accept or discard such ideas based on preconceived notions, I asked a friend who lives in Singapore for his comments.
First, please consider the article Why Singapore's Economy Is Heading For An Iceland-Style Meltdown.
Like Iceland in its heyday, Singapore’s economic stability and vitality – on the surface at least – has made it the envy of the world at a time when most Western economies are languishing with feeble growth, and high rates of unemployment and poverty. Singapore’s booming finance and real estate-focused economy has earned it the moniker “The Switzerland of Asia”, and finance professionals from all over the world are flocking to work there to take refuge from the hard-hit financial sectors in their home countries. Singapore’s unemployment rate is a mere 1.8 percent even as the country’s red hot construction sector has been attracting overseas workers, and a growing number of wealthy citizens are hiring domestic helpers from neighboring countries like the Philippines and Indonesia. The ranks of Singapore’s wealthy are growing rapidly thanks to the country’s asset bubbles, which is helping to fuel a luxury consumption boom in everything from high-end apartments to exotic supercars.
Even though Singapore is no longer an emerging market nation, I consider its bubble economy to be part of the overall emerging markets bubble that I have been warning about due to its strategic role and locationin Southeast Asia, which is also known as ASEAN (Association ofSoutheast Asian Nations). My recent reports on Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines, and Indonesia show that the entire region is caught up in a massive bubble, and Singapore is benefiting from this bubble by acting as ASEAN’s financial center.
Extremely low interest rates in the West and Japan, combined with the U.S. Federal Reserve’s multi-trillion dollar quantitative easing or QE programs resulted in a $4 trillion torrent of speculative “hot money” that flowed into emerging market investments from 2009 to 2013. An international carry trade arose in which investors borrowed significant sums of capital at rock-bottom interest rates from the U.S. and Japan, and directed the proceeds into high-yielding emerging markets assets with the intention of profiting from the difference in interest rates or the spread.
Hot money inflows, combined with central bank policies that allow currency appreciation to temper inflation, have contributed to an approximate 22 percent increase in the value of the Singapore dollar against the U.S. dollar since the financial crisis:
Foreign direct investment (net inflows, current dollars) into Singapore immediately surged to new highs after the financial crisis:
Why Singapore Has A Dangerous Credit Bubble
Like many countries that have experienced economy-wide bubbles and busts – including the U.S. from 2003 to 2007 – Singapore currently has a ballooning credit bubble that is helping to drive economic growth and create an illusion of prosperity. Ultra-low interest rates are the primary reason why credit bubbles inflate in the first place, and Singapore’s bubble is no exception to this pattern.
An idiosyncrasy of Singapore’s interest rate policy makes their low interest rate-fueled credit bubble particularly acute: Singapore’s benchmark interest rate, known as the Singapore interbank offered rate or SIBOR, is tied to the U.S. Fed Funds Rate for the purpose of minimizing large swings in the U.S. dollar-Singapore dollar exchange rate.
Unfortunately, there are extremely dangerous side-effects of Singapore’s interest rate policy ever since the U.S. Federal Reserve has pursued its zero interest rate policy, or ZIRP, after the financial crisis in 2008. Near zero interest rates, which are intended to boost depressed economies like the U.S.’, are much too low for fast-growing economies like Singapore’s.
Hype or Reality?
There is much more to the article, but what appears above is sufficient to understand the claim.
While I do not have firsthand knowledge regarding Singapore, one of my regular contacts "SS" lives there. I sent "SS" the above link and asked about his views.
He responded ...
It's very funny you should have sent me this. Not ten minutes ago I read the attached article in the daily paper refuting the exact same article that you sent.
Unfortunately, your article is accurate and the daily paper is delusional.
When I arrived in Singapore in 2009 and secured a realtor to help me find an apartment, he told me that Asians were coming from all over the continent with large wads of cash in hand, begging him to find some property. Anything. Anywhere. All they wanted was some property in Singapore to invest in.
Eventually I found an apartment, 1,800 sq ft, with a $4.8 million appraised value! (It's probably really worth about $750,000 max). I had to pay $9,800 per month in rent!
When the Asian meltdown comes, it will be catastrophic for prices of everything in Singapore. And I think it's teetering on the precipice.
Hope that answers your question!
Mike "Mish" Shedlock
Welcome to John Ransom’s Stocks in the News where the headlines meet the trendlines:
Stock number one: Twitter, Inc.
Twitter: What Now?- Seeking Alpha
It's been a wild ride for shareholders of social media darling Twitter (TWTR). As 2013 ended and 2014 started, Twitter was one of the most talked about names on the street, and one of the biggest movers. Now that things have calmed down a little, it's time to take another look at Twitter.
Note: 10 percent short interest; small float that trades every 12 days.
Trailing PE NA; Forward PE: NA
Estimate Trend: Flat
Ransom Note Trendline: Avoid Twitter
Stock number two: Facebook
Facebook's Teen Users Down 25% During the Past 3 Years- Motley Fool
A new study shows Facebook's (NASDAQ: FB) teen problem in the U.S. may be worse than previously thought. The study from iStrategyLabs shows self-reported teen users have fallen by 25% during the past three years, while self-reported users in college are down nearly 60%! Read on to find out more.
The question of teens leaving Facebook has been a hot topic this year, as multiple surveys have shown teens losing interest in Facebook. Investors are worried that this could be the start of a larger trend.
Trailing PE: 148 Forward PE: 51
Estimate Trend: UP
Ransom Note Trendline: Hold Facebook
Stock number three: Tesla Motors, Inc.
Tesla sales electrify—Wall Street Journal
Tesla (TSLA) surged in early trading after the company revealed it sold 6,900 Model S sedans last quarter. The company also increased its fourth quarter guidance by 20%.
Note: From the Tesla press release: “Tesla’s highest sales per capita are in Norway and the individual customer who owns the most cars lives in Narvik, which is above the Arctic Circle.”
Trailing PE: NA; Forward PE: 111
Estimate Trend: Down
Ransom Note Trendline: Avoid Tesla
Were Shakespeare alive today, he might be tempted to stage the setting of Macbeth on Wall Street, or perhaps within the confines of the Federal Reserve.
For much as The Three Witches in Macbeth worked their dark magic on the mortals around them, concocting a toxic brew consisting partly of “Root of hemlock digg’d i’ the dark” and “liver of Blaspheming Jew”, so do our control-freak central economic planners attempt to impose their will on market forces.
A stimulus here, a series of Quantitative Easing there, the spell is ongoing. The result is a build-up of both inflationary and deflationary pressure, with an uneasy equilibrium holding sway.
As the pressure mounts with each market cycle and each new ingredient tossed into the cauldron, the balance gets harder and harder to maintain. Even big corrections in the markets only vent enough steam to temporarily stave of the inevitable event that will take place when either the inflationary or deflationary pressure reaches critical mass and overwhelms its counterpart.
Which is why you hear so much about “asset bubbles”—they are the most obvious signs and symptoms of the equilibrium slipping away.
According to Sharmin Mossavar-Rahmani, chief investment officer for Goldman Sachs investment strategy group, “We don’t have bubble troubles yet.”
Mossavar-Rahmani may not be worried about bubble troubles, but I certainly am. Not a bubble in the stock market, that’s not the issue, nor a real-estate bubble or even a bond market bubble. The bubble to watch is a double-bubble, and it definitely spells toil and trouble for the US economy—it’s the cash/debt bubble.
The bad news is there’s a lot of debt out there. The US Government debt alone has grown almost exponentially, from2 trillion, to 4 trillion, to 8 and then quickly now to over 17 trillion dollars.
If that doesn’t classify as a bubble, then I don’t know what does. And that’s not to mention consumer and business debt.
The good news is that there is also a lot of cash out there.
So far, so good; there’s a lot of debt, but also a lot of money out there to cover it.
The really bad news however, is the disconnect between the cash and the debt—the people and entities with the cash aren’t the ones who owe the debt. That’s a serious problem.
Look for example at company like Apple Inc. , which pays little to no taxes while at the same time accumulating a massive hoard of cash, estimated at between 100 and 200 billion dollars.
And that’s just one company.
It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that if all the money is getting sucked up by people and entities that don’t owe the debt, that’s just not sustainable.
And the really sick part is how Obama and his money people seize on this truth and twist it with populist rhetoric about “spreading the wealth around” on the one hand, while on the other they keep accelerating the policies and practices that have led to the concentration of wealth in the first place.
There is a simple and 100% effective way to balance this out before it’s too late, and inflation or deflation breaks through the opposing force causing a true meltdown and not just a painful correction; it’s called free-market capitalism.
President Obama acknowledged—and then dismissed—that theory in his masterpiece of propaganda, the speech delivered in Kansas on December 6, 2011.
In that speech, Obama performed several miracles. For one, he was somehow able to liken himself to Teddy Roosevelt; if you follow his reasoning down the garden path, Barack and Teddy are kindred spirits; patriotic and populist visionaries unfairly branded as radical socialists, both fighting the good fight against the sinister, greedy capitalists.
Which lays the groundwork for another Obama miracle, re-writing history.
“But here’s the problem” Said President Obama. “It (Free markets/Capitalism) doesn’t work. It has never worked. (Applause.) It didn’t work when it was tried in the decade before the Great Depression. It’s not what led to the incredible postwar booms of the ‘50s and ‘60s. And it didn’t work when we tried it during the last decade. (Applause.) I mean, understand, it’s not as if we haven’t tried this theory.”
I commend president Obama for his public speaking skills, his incredible power to persuade. He can make some people believe anything, that Teddy Roosevelt was really a communist, that spending more money is the way to deal with a debt crisis, that it wasn’t capitalism that made the United States the richest most powerful nation on earth.
President Obama is a genius at saying things people agree with, where he intends a different meaning from that which most of his audience understands. You see, President Obama is sincere about “spreading the wealth around”, the only problem is, he doesn’t mean share the wealth of rich Americans with poor Americans, he means share the American wealth with the rest of the world.
Something wicked this way comes? Why wait for it to get to us, let’s rush to it! Lead on, MacDuff!
The wealth of nations has increased by astronomical amounts over the last 2 decades. Literally billions of people have been brought out of poverty thanks to economic freedom. It is as if once the Soviet Union died, once the scourge of international socialism was utterly and completely decimated both economically and intellectually, humanity couldn’t help but lurch forward.
The Berlin Wall “death strip.”
Actually that is what happened.
Sadly we have gone in the opposite direction over the last 2 decades. Instead of freeing our economy we have wrapped it ever more in welfare state red tape. We have regulations on top of regulations on top of regulations. We make it harder for businesses to start. We make it harder for businesses to hire. We promise completely unrealistic pensions to government workers which are paid for by workers and businesses and crush the finances of our great cities. We nationalize car companies. We bail out banks which should be dead. Our government picks winners and losers of all kinds in the economy (and is almost always wrong – at great cost). In short, the United States which for so long was a beacon of liberty and economic freedom has dimmed dramatically. A system of crony capitalism has taken hold. The state (often the corporate state) is ubiquitous.
We must again embrace liberty and economic freedom. This is the way to an American Renaissance. We can again lead the world. We can again be a source of hope to the world.
You know, REAL hope.
(From The Wall Street Journal)
It’s not hard to see why the U.S. is losing ground. Even marginal tax rates exceeding 43% cannot finance runaway government spending, which has caused the national debt to skyrocket. The Obama administration continues to shackle entire sectors of the economy with regulation, including health care, finance and energy. The intervention impedes both personal freedom and national prosperity.
But as the U.S. economy languishes, many countries are leaping ahead, thanks to policies that enhance economic freedom—the same ones that made the U.S. economy the most powerful in the world. Governments in 114 countries have taken steps in the past year to increase the economic freedom of their citizens. Forty-three countries, from every part of the world, have now reached their highest economic freedom ranking in the index’s history.
This post reprinted from Against Crony Capitalism
New Time 11:20 AM PT: Get the Market Movements in Advance: William's Edge Webinar for Monday April 21st, 2014 | John Ransom
New Time 11:20 AM PT: Get the Market Movements in Advance: William's Edge Webinar for Wednesday April 16th, 2014 | John Ransom