U.S. Deputy Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman announced April 3 that the U.S. government's "Rewards for Justice" (RFJ) program was offering a $10 million reward for information leading to the capture and conviction of Hafiz Mohammad Saeed, the founder of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). In other Rewards for Justice cases involving Pakistan, suspects such as Osama bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri, Abdel Basit and Mir Amal Kansi have hidden in Pakistan and maintained relatively low profiles. In this case, Saeed is a very public figure in Pakistan. He even held a news conference April 4 in Rawalpindi announcing his location and taunting the United States by saying he was willing to share his schedule with U.S. officials.

While the Saeed case is clearly a political matter rather than a pure law enforcement or intelligence issue, the case has focused a great deal of attention on Rewards for Justice, and it seems an opportune time to examine the history and mechanics of the program.

Rewards for Justice

In the shadow of the 1983 and 1984 bombings of the U.S. Embassy in Beirut, the 1983 bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Kuwait and the 1983 Marine barracks bombing in Lebanon, the U.S. Congress established the Rewards for Justice program under the 1984 Act to Combat International Terrorism. The program is administered by the U.S. Department of State's Diplomatic Security Service, which was established by the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986.

The program was intended not only to reward people who provide information that leads to the arrest or conviction of people who plan, commit or attempt terrorist attacks against U.S. targets but also to obtain information that prevents such attacks. U.S. government employees and the employees of other governments are not eligible for the program. The law also authorizes program participants to be entered into the U.S. Department of Justice witness protection program to ensure their safety after providing information. The statute covers arrests of and convictions for the subjects sought and contains a clause for "favorable resolution" of such cases that can be applied when a military strike results in the death of the suspect.

1
Stewart Scott

Stewart Scott

Stewart Scott is a security analyst for Stratfor.

Most Recent Articles

Join the Debate
12 Comments So Far
DauTieng59 Wrote: Apr 17, 2012 4:34 PM
One of the reasons is that the US rats out paople who are tracking terrorists, such as the guy from Colorado, who was in Islamabad and heading out in the direction of the town OBL was finally killed in.
It's more government propaganda, "We're doing everything, we can to protect you."
fgdfgsdgwe Wrote: Apr 16, 2012 10:14 PM


ONLINE STORE :
----- ( http://ai.vc/uq )--------

Christan Audigier bikini $23

Ed Hardy Bikini $23

Smful short_t-shirt_woman $15

ed hardy short_tank_woman $16

Sandal $32

christian louboutin $80

Sunglass $15

COACH_Necklace $27

handbag $33

AF tank woman $17

puma slipper woman $30


----- ( http://ai.vc/uq )--------

3129 Wrote: Apr 16, 2012 6:25 PM
The bounties created by the terrorists are also hard to collect on. The penalties for even being seen talking to us infidels is often death. I suspect that a lot of the RFJ funding goes into the pockets of employees of the State Department.
Gene158 Wrote: Apr 16, 2012 5:06 PM
why don't these bounties work?
1. the families of the snitch, for generations to come, will be slaughtered
2. the money is of no significance to most, if not all, of them
3. they'd rather draw blood than draw money out of a bank account
boldaq Wrote: Apr 16, 2012 1:10 PM
The $25 million Bush put on Bin Laden's head forced him so far underground that he was rendered harmless. Killing him made absolutely no difference in the war on terror.
Blair31 Wrote: Apr 16, 2012 3:08 PM
Now bin Laden's shaking hands with the Devil.
willis9 Wrote: Apr 16, 2012 11:39 AM
Rewards announcements are political grand standing and an admission that our investigative infrastructure is largely ineffective. We have no real field operatives that could be buying information on the cheap, the human intelligence gathering. Instead we have hoards of desk jockeys that can not speak the language of the country that they are assigned to cover analyzing satellite data and reading foreign news papers english edition. Most of the communication intercepts are never translated or dots connected. Billions are spent on an intelligence bureaucracy that produces little more than soft jobs and fat pensions.
MoreFreedom Wrote: Apr 16, 2012 9:17 AM
Seems to me, the rewards are very small compared to the 3 billion we send to Pakistan (our supposed ally) every year. The Pakistani politicians in power would rather keep the billions coming, than allow a paltry 10 million to upset their voters. This is no surprise.

A simple solution is to quit sending the Pakistani's money at our expense. But the politicians don't want to do that. Why that makes too much sense for government.
3129 Wrote: Apr 16, 2012 6:27 PM
If it were not for our billion dollar bribes, the Taliban would already have control of Pakistan's nukes.
Ron4594 Wrote: Apr 16, 2012 8:39 AM
It's hard because it's hard for bounty hunters to get into the WH to get at the terrorists.
skbvhs9 Wrote: Apr 16, 2012 8:37 AM
www.plzzshop.com
!free shipping!
j0rdan sh0es........ 28 dollar
c0ach p-u-r-s-e...... 25 dollar
c00gi cl0thes........ 20 dollar
U.G.G B00ts.......... 39 dollar
Dear Friend:
We can supply all kind jersey with good quality and low price. contact me, let's talk details.
Delivery time: 5-6days, Shipping Method: EMS
Newest stock list: every 3-5days updated
Warm Regards,
Carolyn

www.plzzshop.com
Frank130 Wrote: Apr 16, 2012 5:15 AM
"One of the big assumptions behind the initiation of the program, and the subsequent increases in the amount of the rewards offered, is that everybody is for sale... Second, there is a general distrust of the U.S. government..." - S.S.

Since corrupt US politicians have been able to "buy" votes with money to get elected/re-elected in here, they mistakenly think they can buy everyone & anything elsewhere in the world. But foreigners have more common sense than the easily bought/led sheeple the US voters have turned into. Foreigners have also recognized the financial & moral collapse of the once great USA & no longer trust/admire us (for good reason).