Over the holidays, we updated and corrected our original analysis of the rate of assaults in both the United States and Canada. It turns out that one of our original charts had only shown the number of Level 2 and 3 assaults for Canada rather than all nonfatal, nonsexual assaults and our calculation of the total assault rate for Canada was also off by about 30 assaults per 100,000 Canadians.

Today, we're going to revisit that analysis and then take things one step further and do a more direct comparison of the rate of assaults between the populations of the two nations by extracting the assault rate data for the portion of the U.S. population that is most demographically similar to the entire population of Canada.

First, let's take a look at the total number of nonfatal, nonsexual assaults for the entire populations of both nations in 2006 in the following chart:

Nonfatal, Nonsexual Assaults for Canada and the United States, 2006

Here, we see that Canadians experienced some 253,704 assaults in 2006, while Americans recorded 1,598,706 nonfatal, nonsexual assaults in the same year.

Next, because the size of the two nations' populations is so different, let's compare the rate of assaults for each 100,000 people in both nations in our next chart. Note that the U.S. data is based upon the entire population, include the nation's very large black and Hispanic sub-populations, which are nearly absent in Canada (Canadian blacks make up about 2% of that nation's population, while the percentage share of Hispanics in Canada make up less than 1% of Canada's population.):

Nonfatal, Nonsexual Assaults per 100,000 People for Canada and the United States, 2006
1
Political  Calculations

Political Calculations

Political Calculations is a site that develops, applies and presents both established and cutting edge theory to the topics of investing, business and economics.

Be the first to read Political Calculation's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Most Recent Articles

Join the Debate
21 Comments So Far
rigby4 Wrote: Jan 12, 2013 8:39 PM
One thing left out was the fact that Canada is being taken over by people of Asian decent. Generally peaceful hard working group. Were as america is being over run by blacks and mexicians who are quite the opposite
Nightowl872 Wrote: Feb 07, 2013 3:48 PM
Who do you belive is buying up everything loose in America??
rigby4 Wrote: Jan 12, 2013 7:47 PM
You will never get a Canadian to admit to this.
Andy583 Wrote: Jan 12, 2013 9:59 PM
Admit that the second graph is correct? As a Canadian from rural Alberta, i freely and fully admit it's true. More guns do equal less crime.
rficara Wrote: Jan 12, 2013 4:20 PM
They don't want to hear OR debate facts. Rush did a one man skit on it:

Rush: the U.K. has a higher overall violent crime rate than us.
Idiot liberal: "But in Newtown all those kids were killed, I saw it on TV, we've got to ban the guns."
Rush: Millions of Americans foil violent assault with guns each year over 2,300 a day.
Idiot: "But in Newtown all those kids were killed, I saw it on TV, we've got to ban the guns."
Rush: Rifles are used in less than 1% of all homicides & "black rifles" in less than 0.25%.
Idiot: "But in Newtown all those kids were kill, I saw it on TV, we've got to ban the guns."

This is a brick wall of willful ignorance and a surrogate religion. You CAN'T argue against a faith with facts and reality.

Ray
NRA Life
Nightowl872 Wrote: Feb 07, 2013 3:50 PM
Don't argue with an idiot, he will bring you down to his level and beat you with experience!!
Lois75 Wrote: Jan 12, 2013 2:03 PM
Although we have a small black population in Canada, the ones who are here tend to come from countries who have a violent population in their home country, such as Somalia. We do have black gangs here who fight with each other. Killing is often by stabbing, however, criminals can get guns, even when ordinary people cannot. There are also native Indians who have a high rate of violent offenses, especially on their own reserves. My advice would be to hang onto your guns and protect yourself. Lois
TDBLU Wrote: Jan 12, 2013 2:43 PM
Unfortunate. But unfortunate does not mean it is an untruth. I knew a couple sisters who devoted their lives as nurses to many different classes, casts and colors. They too, readily admitted a noticeably higher level of racism, agression, and sustance abuse in those same people. I think we share part of the blame in allowing them to missuse Gov hand-outs to the point they EXPECT to do so.
Archie1954 Wrote: Jan 12, 2013 1:58 PM
The reason non fatal assaults are more than in the US per capita is because in the US many of these assaults would be moved over to the fatal category due to gun proliferation.
TDBLU Wrote: Jan 12, 2013 2:33 PM
Not sure what your point was, but the point of the report is that there Are assaults, firearms or no firearms. BUT, firearms mean LESS assaults over-all, get it ? Fewer agressive minded people will carry out aggresive action, where citizens own firearms. You can either act on a symptom of violence,(use of firearms) or prevent the violence from occurring in the first place. You say that a few million more physical attacks,robberies,burglaries and rapes are something we should tolerate if it fits your victimhood philosophy.
rficara Wrote: Jan 12, 2013 4:23 PM
I see the point very clearly. On top of his head under the foil cap.

Ray
Louis206 Wrote: Jan 12, 2013 12:27 PM
i also saw a great piece yesterday.

we need to ask our Leaders to Lead by Example. Obama, Bloomberg, Feinstein, Pelosi et al need to IMMEDIATELY disband their armed security details.

If the citizens have no need for guns, surely our political leaders have no need for armed security.
Louis206 Wrote: Jan 12, 2013 12:25 PM
seems like folks are missisng the obvious.

unless I am reading this wrong, we could cut assaults/homicides by 2/3's if we...........banned blacks and hispanics.

Viola!
TDBLU Wrote: Jan 12, 2013 2:16 PM
Ben Franklin said something like "The two greatest fools are blame all, and praise all". Obammunism places the blame on everything/everyone else BUT themselves, and buys votes with tax-payer money by pouring even More money we don't have by praising a new, rapidly expanding cultural class of professional victims. I wonder where in the world His Highness will go when the remainder of his counterfeit money runs out.
rficara Wrote: Jan 12, 2013 4:22 PM
He also said:
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on dinner where liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote."

Ray from Bloombergia
NRA Life
Soli Deo Gloria!!
Pistol Wrote: Jan 12, 2013 5:23 AM
The scarey looking gun ban so popular once again with unthinking moonbeams was in effect for 10 years ending a few years ago. It nod NO visible impact on gun crime when it went into effect, and no visible impact when it expired. Statistics show long guns, rifles and shotguns both, are used in less than 1 % of firearms crime. So-called assault rifles are a small part of that 1 %. Clearly, reducing crime is not the scarey weapon banner's agenda.

It is a federal law that a felon can not be in possession of a pistol. This law is ignored by the same folks who gave us Fast and Furious. When and where enforced, this law drops gun crime between 30 and 40 %. Nixon tried enforcement for a couple years in a few major cities and its success
Pistol Wrote: Jan 12, 2013 5:24 AM
astonished even its advocates. Why is it not enforced now, if the gov wants to reduce gun crimes?
TDBLU Wrote: Jan 12, 2013 2:03 PM
But don't "Gun Free"zones work ? I mean, didn't you just hear about that bar down in rural texas that just had a maniac come in and massacre all the, um, the . . .all, errrr. Oh yeah, come to think of it, I haven't heard of that kind of thing happening either.
TDBLU Wrote: Jan 12, 2013 2:29 AM
This data, like the results of several before it, state quite clearly that someone looking to assault someone else, is far, far more likely to attack someone else if they know they don't have to worry about contacting lead poisoning. Look at this Libs. Your way of doing things encourages violence. I'll say it again. Liberal practices ENCOURAGE violence. "An armed population is a polite population".
rwright Wrote: Jan 12, 2013 3:39 PM
This data is so skewed to produce the desired result, that it is useless. There are lies, dam..d lies and statistics, according to a famous American. This rubbish proves it.