We have been tracking a new potential indicator of the level of economic distress in the U.S. economy: the number of publicly-traded companies declaring whether they will act to cut their dividends each month. The data is now out for the just completed month of September 2012, which Standard and Poor has published in Excel spreadsheet format, which we've used to update our chart tracking this measure of economic health:

Number of Public U.S. Companies Posting Decreasing Dividends, 
January 2004 through September 2012

According to the Economist, through 2011, there are just under 5,000 companies whose shares are traded on the major stock exchanges in the United States. For their September 2012 dividend report, Standard and Poor's data covers 3,098 of them.

What's important to note is that in a relatively healthy and growing economy, there is very little reason for companies to act to cut their dividends. Looking at the available historic data, we find that for any given month outside a period of recession, that there are fewer than ten companies that have taken this action.

The reason dividend cuts are so significant is because firms are very reluctant to reduce their cash payouts to shareholders, as the action communicates that the company may either be struggling to continue to operate profitably or that it lacks financial flexibility, which is the ability to tap either cash reserves or to borrow money to meet its expected business needs.

1
Political  Calculations

Political Calculations

Political Calculations is a site that develops, applies and presents both established and cutting edge theory to the topics of investing, business and economics.

Be the first to read Political Calculation's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Most Recent Articles

Join the Debate
26 Comments So Far
« Previous1Next »
101AirbrnDiv Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 10:22 PM
Here's what the feckless Republican party has told its dupes to parrot about the USA's annual budget.

"Federal spending in 2008 was $2.98 trillion under Bush, the highest spending of any one year during his Presidency.
Obama 2009 = $3.52 trillion; Obama 2010 = $3.46 trillion; From: http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/fed_spending_2010USrs"

Here's what these lapdogs do not know. 2009 belongs to GEORGE W. BUSH. These years are FISCAL YEARS. FY2009=(Oct.08-Sept.09) Bush signed the 2009 Fiscal Year budget.

Bush handed out the TARP money to Wall Street; Obama got it back.
Bush moved the costs of the wars off-budget; Obama put it on the budget. Let's not forget; the Republicans lie and American soldiers die.
UNSbobblehead Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 10:03 PM
As a start, I'd be happy to just close our 20+ military bases in the UK. We have enough 'power projection platforms' (as NEO-CONS like to call them) already, throughout the rest of Europe.

I mean, who are we protecting the UK from? Mighty Iceland to the north? The dour Irish to the west? The pugnacious Norwegians to the east? The wine-sipping French to the south?

Too many goodly Americans still think there is an East and West Germany!
lojjgkdgj Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 9:36 PM
Wonderful.

Share a website with you ,

http://www.clothes8.us

Believe you will love it

Accept credit card and free shipping.
UNSbobblehead Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 8:13 PM
Republicans short-change how much this country spends on national security. Let's look at the spending of $693 billion in FY2010 for the Department of Defense. The Republicans say only 5% of the economy committed to national security; and that statement is bogus.

Republicans did not include the costs for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Republicans do no not include the cost of the Veteran's Administration.

Republicans do not include the cost of the National Security Agency. One Republican once told me that the NSA should not be included because the NSA has nothing to do with national security.

Republicans do not include the cost for the Central Intelligence Agency, the Department of Homeland Security.
chipsmydog Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 9:52 PM
You're not witty.
You're not honest.
You're not creative.
But you are dull. High five.
101AirbrnDiv Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 7:49 PM
Tea party people say, "Drill Here, drill now!"

I say, "All the cheap to obtain oil has already been had in America. It's more financially sound for Exxon to just purchase oil from the Middle East and then resell it here."

They say, "How about oil shale?"

I tell them the cost of production for squeezing oil out of rock may be greater than $150 per barrel and the energy companies want the American taxpayer to guarantee/subsidize the cost of this extraction.

The Tea Party guy says, "Let's do it!"

I say "So much for small government and free markets!"

Outside of the knowledge provided by the Republican party propaganda machine, I've found all Tea Party people to be essentially blank.
chipsmydog Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 10:02 PM
I've always found humanistic liberals to be self serving fear mongers who would throw their own mothers under a bus as a means to their ideological ends.
YESWECAN Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 11:28 PM
101 you really are a fool and know nothing about your subjects. Especially the oil industry.
USNbubblehead Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 7:38 PM

PSA:

Sybil has taken to hijacking handles again. I think it likes me.

The poster going around as 101AirbnDiv is Sybil as well.

She's got a thing for men in uniform, I guess.
UNSbobblehead Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 7:33 PM
The main thrust of the German Panzer attack simply by-passed the Maginot Line, rendering it obsolete.

If a rogue country wants to put a nuke bomb into an American city.

It will be smuggled in. How many illegals have sneaked in?

It will be flown in on a private jet. This private jet will simply veer off course the final minute and go Boom.

It will be sailed in. Any yacht can stow aboard a nuke bomb and then sail into any American port of its choice.

Missile defense presumes the enemy will follow our line of convenient thinking. It's not about 'missile defense', it's about 'preventing a nuke bomb from entering an American city.'
John C6 Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 7:40 PM
Gentle Readers,

This entire post is ' off-topic ', and, like most TownHall readers, I usually won't
reply to ' off-topic ' posts,

However,

The statement that ' missile defense presumes ..... " is incorrect.

Missile defenses defend against missile attacks. Anti-submarine defenses
defend against submarine attacks. Anti-terrorist measure defend against
terrorism. ETC.

The post here presumes that as missile defenses won't defend against tanks,
Martian Robots or terrorists, they have no value. That's ridiculous. Missile
defense has value as it defends against missiles.

Sincerely,

John Lepant Brighton CO
USNbubblehead Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 7:45 PM

You could never be me, Sybil; I'm warm-blooded and walk upright on two legs.

The word's out now, though. Prepare to be flagged and removed.
101AirbrnDiv Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 7:13 PM
I am getting tired of reading things like "have you served?" or "you don't have a right to say anything unless..."

My RIGHTS come from God and are self-evident.

People who think they can take away MY God given rights are behaving like Nazis. Yes, specifically, they behave like the Nazi concentration camp commander in Schindler's List.

Remember him, the one, Amon Goeth who fancied himself saying "I bestow upon you!"
101AirbrnDiv Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 7:14 PM
Take a hike you Republican Nazi wannabees. You can't bestow anything upon me, for they have already been given to me, by a higher being!!
John C6 Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 7:42 PM
Dear 101,

Again, another off-topic post, but....

.... No one is proposing to ' take away ' your rights. People are merely
pointing out that if you haven't served, you should be grateful to those
who have defended your rights for you.

There's nothing wrong with doing that, and it takes nothing away from you,
or anyone else.

Sincerely,

John Lepant
Blair31 Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 3:12 PM
With a recession, the party in power, the Democrats in the case of the Senate and the White House,
is usually blamed for it.
duggy2 Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 2:13 PM
Almost No media is talking about the debt in any meaningful way...why debt? where does money come from? who creates debt? who pays debt? what is debt doing to us?

central banks are destroying economies. ..the  central banks are private cartels. .not owned by the people or their governments...these privately owned money creators manufacture money from nothing and use it to buy a country's debt  notes aka bonds..government bonds..debt notes..gov't borrows all its spendy....!

In the usa,  the criminal syndicate producing federal reserve notes as opposed to united states notes uses the FRN's to purchase u s treasury notes which are debt paper that we cits have to  pay for with income taxes..why? We should print our own value notes aka u s dol
UNSbobblehead Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 2:09 PM
“Cheap” foreign oil comes with huge hidden costs that American leaders and the public need to keep in mind when thinking about U.S. foreign policy. According to one estimate, gasoline would cost U.S. consumers $5 more per gallon if federal spending for the defense of Persian Gulf oil were incorporated into gas prices. The U.S. military subsidy for oil means lower prices at the gas pump, but consumers ultimately a pay a steep price for that fake discount (and more) in the form of higher taxes and inflationary deficit financing to help fund a large U.S. military presence abroad. The king’s ransom that the United States spends to defend Persian Gulf oil is more than ten times the value of its annual imports from the Gulf.
YESWECAN Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 10:09 AM
When are you boobs going to learn that it is the CAREER POLITICIANS who have gotten us into this mess. We have to have TERM LIMITS. Open your eyes and minds. DUMMIES!
Greg1084 Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 8:51 AM
Think of the mess President Obama is going to inherit if he's re-elected.
Curtis104 Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 12:12 PM
It will still be Bush's fault, besides, the economy, the fact that the middle class is disappearing, prices going up, more people on food stamps, our enemies emboldened by our wimp president, all those things, are just "A bump in the road. " to Obuma!
Joe 145 Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 8:41 AM
This does not surprise me, although it does support more of what I already knew. I am dependent upon dividends for part of my income, had planned it this way. What I did not plan on is a President who believes that I did not build this and is doing his best to take it away from me.

Not exactly an original American concept. And people wonder why some question his being an American?
Pistol Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 5:10 AM
All these charts and government supplied statistics and speeches and talking heads are very nice, but it does not take a rocket scientist or a PhD in statistics to merely look around and see the bottom half of the labor force is in major distress. College grads and those capable of handling high-tech or high-skilled jobs are doing at least OK. Virtually the entire burden of a sagging economy is being borne by blue collar labor, and the unskilled or functionally illiterate. That 7.8 rate ( WHAT A JOKE) does not apply to college grads or skilled trades. It is being created by 50 % unemployment for black teenagers, 25 % unemployment in inner cities, and 20 % unhemployment for high school dropouts. Reagan stated More Government is not the
Pistol Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 5:11 AM
solution, it is the problem. Until Joe and Jane Sixpack figure this out, they are going to take it in the shorts.
Context Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 7:52 AM
You hit the nail when you said "functionally Illiterate." Next time be honest and say "Democrats."
« Previous1Next »