The BLS' report on the number of new jobless claims filed in the week ending 15 September 2012 indicates that the pace of layoffs in the United States is accelerating at the fastest pace since the 2007 recession began.

At present, the average rate of increase in the number of initial unemployment insurance benefit claims filed each week since the most recent trend began on 7 July 2012 has reached 2,800 per week. That figure is greater than the average rate of increase of 1,641 layoffs per week that was recorded as the U.S. entered into recession in December 2007. That figure held through 26 July 2008, when high oil and gasoline prices accelerated the recession into high gear, increasing the rate of new layoffs in the U.S. to 7,599 per week. Closeup of Residual Distribution for Weekly Seasonally-Adjusted Initial Unemployment Insurance Claims, 26 March 2011 through 15 September 2011

You can see how today's rate of increase in the rate of new jobless claims being filed compares with those observed in the 2007 recession in our chart showing the residual distribution of the major trends for layoffs since the beginning of 2006 (see here for a description of the primary trends indicated on our chart below):

 

Like the sharp increase in 2008, we believe that today's high oil and gasoline prices are driving the sharp increase in the trend for U.S. layoffs.

Unlike previous situations when the price of gasoline increased beyond the $3.50 per gallon threshold that we've observed seems to mark the level for "high" gasoline prices in the United States, it appears that employers did not react as suddenly to the onset of these prices as they have in the past.

1
Political  Calculations

Political Calculations

Political Calculations is a site that develops, applies and presents both established and cutting edge theory to the topics of investing, business and economics.

Be the first to read Political Calculation's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Most Recent Articles

Join the Debate
14 Comments So Far
Blair31 Wrote: Sep 23, 2012 8:47 PM
I don't care. I don't invest.
Grant75 Wrote: Sep 23, 2012 12:56 PM
I have to think it is no accident that this administration is stifling economic growth. Common sense tells us that is where regulation and taxation lead. They are not stupid – so the rationale must be: the higher the unemployment, the more welfare, the more votes for Obama. I believe this man’s primary mission is to stay in office, not to create private sector jobs.
Dorothy152 Wrote: Sep 23, 2012 11:43 AM
If you are getting government checks why not keep the system going, at least until it breaks down!
Joe 145 Wrote: Sep 23, 2012 8:52 AM
The price of oil and fuel do impact the economy to a large degree. In addition, the overall direction of our economy is government allocation of a great percentage of our overall GDP. Unless you believe that government can allocate the resources of a nation better than the private organizations, then lower productivity can be the only result.

Socialist economic policies are yielding socialist economic results.
David70 Wrote: Sep 23, 2012 9:36 AM
Disagree on productivity. Due to all the uncertainty Obozo has brought about resulting in employers not hiring, productivity is high with fewer workers performing at higher levels.
Dbeaux2 Wrote: Sep 23, 2012 7:02 AM
The private sector is doing fine. Haven't you heard?
comsense08 Wrote: Sep 23, 2012 10:05 AM
johnm h Wrote: Sep 23, 2012 7:02 AM
It isn't gasoline prices. To assert that it is gas prices is to accept Keynesian thinking. It is depressed expectations deriving from uncertainty caused by increased regulations, growing state power, nationalizations, unknown tax rates, unknown health care costs. Oil prices are a relative price and were it not for regulations and Obama energy policies would be adjusted to. Get it right kids. Study the Austrians if you want to understand micro and macro.
Greg1084 Wrote: Sep 23, 2012 8:49 AM
Amen. Throw in Public Choice economics, too.
silvereagle Wrote: Sep 23, 2012 6:21 AM
The sad thing is that if you ask the administration about the trend their response will be. "it's all good".
comsense08 Wrote: Sep 23, 2012 10:07 AM
And it is for their agenda, which ought to tell us everything. We don't no stinking media to tell us what's going on.