With the role of red bureaucratic tape in hampering small business just in the news, we thought we'd take a historic look at how many pages of new rules and regulations the federal government spits out every year.

Or rather, in each year beginning with 1936, because that's all as far back as we could find the data! Our chart below visualizes what we found.

Generally speaking, with the exception of the period of World War 2, we find that the federal government used to be pretty well contained when it came to imposing new rules and regulations on the American people - at least, all the way up to 1970, when it appears to have undergone a bureaucratic explosion. Number of Pages of Regulations Added to the Federal Register Each Year, 1936-2011

Here, the creation of the Environmental Protection Agency appears to have been the impetus for unleashing unprecedented waves of new rules and regulations affecting nearly every aspect of American life all throughout the next decade.

That changed in the 1980s, as the number of new rules and regulations being issued each year was brought under control. In the 1990s though, the number of federal regulations began creeping steadily upward.

In the first decade of the twenty-first century though, the amount of new rules and regulations issued each year was largely stable. That changed with the financial crisis of 2008, which saw new rules and regulations issued by the federal government spike in that year, but which abated with the waning of the crisis in 2009 as the number of pages issued to the Federal Register fell.

In 2010 however, President Obama cranked up the federal government's regulation mill to all time highs, keeping it there at least through 2011.

1
Political  Calculations

Political Calculations

Political Calculations is a site that develops, applies and presents both established and cutting edge theory to the topics of investing, business and economics.

Be the first to read Political Calculation's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Most Recent Articles

Join the Debate
35 Comments So Far
« Previous1Next »
Edward570 Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 3:00 AM
There should be a sunset provision in these regulations and rules. 5 years and they go away unless re-approved.
Edward570 Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 2:53 AM
Over 80,000 new rules and regulations this year. Do you still believe the government won't be satisfied until they control every aspect of your life? This is what happens when you let lawyers breed.
Texas Chris Wrote: Jul 30, 2012 1:24 PM
It is important to note that the total number of pages of regulation on file, the SIZE of the Federal Registry, has not decreased since the end of WWII. It has increased by 20,000 to 80,000 pages every year since about 1950.

Ironically, our freedoms have decreased at exactly that same pace.
Sid14 Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 11:58 PM
The road to the police state is paved with statutory laws. In 1934, when FDR declared a "state of emergence", we were transformed from a country under common law, requiring injury, damage and a victim to have a "crime", to a country under statutory "police state" powers that circumvent ALL of the above requirements. Since then we have been almost completely under police state powers with the creation of an endless stream of statutory laws regulating every aspect of our lives at the expense of our liberties. Nearly EVERY judge, lawyer, politician and police officer enforces this tyranny against our liberties.
fneel Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 11:12 PM
what Maria explained I'm amazed that someone can get paid $6438 in one month on the computer. did you read this website >>> http://click2go.notlong.com/
elko-mike Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 6:30 PM
The Regulatory Branch of government is tyrannical. In Federalist #47 Madison wrote, "[t]he accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny."
These unelected, over-officious, nanny-state bureaucrats write rules, determine when the rules have been broken, and impose fines.
According to SBA Studies, $1 of every $7 of economic output is consumed by society to satisfy the demands of the Regulatory Branch of government. It will be essential to rid ourselves of these parasites in order to get the economy growing again.
None1257 Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 2:25 PM
Please note that the it does not matter if the President is a republican or a democrat, whether congress is controlled by republicans or congress is controlled by democrats, there were ALWAYS more regulations.
Topeka Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 5:25 PM
1. Presidents are responsible for promulgating regumalations per laws created by Congress.

2. Point one, combined with Anti-Everything Hysteria by the Left makes it difficult to not promulgate in response to existing litigation. The Bushies faced a lot of this. eg: Promulgating in response to mandatory EPA "phases" and more stringent roll-outs of standards - the Bushies were attacked as "gutting" the CWA and the CAA even while they pushed more reg's than Clinton - on the basis that Bushies refused to send out the unicorns and moonbats ...

3. Take out Nixon, and clearly the curves are better even for Lib-tard-lite Repubniks. Reagan has the only consistent downturn since the post-WWII era

... just FYI
Bob570 Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 12:38 PM
So just how many Regulation are there in total. Plus 70 to 80 thousand new regulations during a Republican administration is not STABLE, it's Criminal, Mr. Bush.
Topeka Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 12:20 PM
brilliant ...

... but you left out state regulations promulgated in accordance with the Federal reg's.

... except for Immigration - the state's virtually have to keep pace in their reg's with the Fed's - except a few Regumlation leaders such as CA or MA where the lib-tards test drive the reg's to get "persuasive" authority for judicial imposition of their fiats in other states. there are few exceptions to this rule, very few, which exist primarily at boundaries where the state agencies are out of money so the Fed's stopped pushing ...
sfischer Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 10:52 AM
poorgrandchildren.com2 Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 10:43 AM
""There ought to be a law..."--Motto of American fascists
George33 Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 2:01 PM
There OUGHT to be a law, that for every page of new law or regulation, there must be two old pages taken away. Then when we get the total level down to 1935 levels - take away page for page.
Louie13 Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 2:23 PM
And that ought to be a law that any federal law cannot exceed ten pages. Enough of the two thousand page monstrosities that have everything but the kitchen sink hidden in them.
Daniel982 Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 10:31 AM
You're already guilty, all they have to do is decide which law or regulation to charge you with.

Ever read "Three Felonies a Day"?
renny4 Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 9:50 AM
I doubt Congress will have the guts, but if the Reps. take Cong. and the pres. in Nov., unlike the system under Bush II, I hope they can STOP passing laws and STOP thinking absolutely everything needs a federal law and get rid of some we have:

sell off Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac (the PO is mandated under the Const.), repeal the CRAs that assume all banks are racial discriminators (banks will lend money that they think they can make money on), rein in the EPA or shove it into Interior along with Energy or eliminate them, get HHS our of every hospital and drs.' office, repeal ocare in its entirety, & let med. ins. be sold among the states & allow people to take med. ins. from job to job. Kill the Dept of Ed.

The states can handle the rest
Fuzzy2 Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 10:19 AM
Can't get anything done without supermajority in Senate. They can stop a new legislation but can't get rid of anything non-financial.
poorgrandchildren.com2 Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 8:32 AM
Fascism is a system under which individuals have the illusion of ownership of businesses while government controls all the major policies and procedures. When the inevitable failures occur, government blames capitalism and evil greedy businessmen. Now, try to convince me we have freedom of enterprise and not fascism.

"Miss me yet?"--King George, III
Topeka Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 12:24 PM
... poor ...

good post - but the reason for the illusions success is the slow roll out. Some Americans experienced this over 100 years ago - the very first segregation laws and Jim Crow laws - others later, and still later and so on.

since the govt comes for us one at a time - often to the chorus of envious or jealous shouts of "Get 'em!" due to a crime (true or fake) - we always lose
Michael Bowler (formerly Michael) Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 7:59 AM
Please note, the graph shows NEW pages of regulations each year...since there are literally millions of pages at this point, doesn't it seem like the number should eventually drop as every thing is covered.

When you have a mountain of regulations, so many that no single person could possibly know all of them...or even half, it becomes a situation where every citizen is in violation of something. This provides government with the golden opportunity to get anyone it so desires for something anytime they choose...which is the real point of the exercise. And they do.
Fuzzy2 Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 10:18 AM
There are probably hundreds of laws contradicting each other by now.
Daniel982 Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 10:34 AM
Francis W. Porretto Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 5:48 AM
To a would-be totalitarian, alphabet-agency regulation has two huge advantages over legislated law:
1. Regulators are faceless drones who can't be voted out of office;
2. Legislators can use them as foils: by campaigning against "unreasonable and excessive regulation" (and then doing nothing about it), and by securing exceptions for favored constituents (a.k.a. "constituent services.").

The whole thing smacks of Stalin's methods ("a good Tsar, led astray by evil counsellors"). I'm not gullible enough to believe it "just happened." Are you?

Fuzzy2 Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 10:17 AM
doc, aka Rich Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 2:08 AM
At various times I've heard a lot of suggestions for constitutional overhaul (new amendments) to fix this or that. Some of them target controlling regulation, such as making it a constitutional amendment that all laws self-expire ... if you want a law continued it has to be renewed at some regular interval or it evaporates on it's own. Or the proposal that no law can be longer than a chapter ... most everything in the constitution and amendments was short and clear for the first 150 years. There's no reason for laws that number into the thousands of pages that even those people who have to vote on it don't know what they're voting on.
Michael Bowler (formerly Michael) Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 8:41 AM
The whole point of laws, written in legalese, with 100s or 1000s of pages and passed without clear public understanding, is to ensnare the entire public into a constant state of violation...making any citizen who falls into disfavor guilty of something...

It's a nightmare for the individual and a permanent stranglehold by the government, just the way any statist would want it.
renny4 Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 9:52 AM
No bill should be over 8 pages, the size of the first Civil Rights Act.
Fuzzy2 Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 10:17 AM
I am so glad to see people feeling the same way I do. 8 pages? Ok, but knowing politicians, they will just reduce the font to microscopic size. How about maximum characters of 3,500?

I bill for each individual subject too. No add-ons for items unrelated to the bill being voted on.
Daniel982 Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 10:38 AM
Ya got to put teeth into the rules. How about having every proposed law or regulation be presented by the sponsors while they're wearing a rope around their neck(s). If the law or regulation fails to pass, use the rope.
Fuzzy2 Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 10:42 AM
The rope thing has a lot of promise.
I would also state that ceding any U.S sovereignty to foreign entities is guilty of treason. Thus giving the UN or any outside entity the ability to rule over an American is punishable by death.
Fuzzy2 Wrote: Jul 29, 2012 10:43 AM
I'll state that in english.

Any legislator ceding US authority to foreign powers is guilty of treason.
RVNUSMC Wrote: Jul 30, 2012 6:51 AM
The Civil Rights act is unconstitutional . . .
« Previous1Next »