Despite the breathless post-election "think pieces" that have drawn sweeping and deeply considered conclusions about the political drift of the country, at its core President Obama's re-election is easy to understand. He essentially promised millions of middle and working class voters that if he were to be re-elected, they would receive benefits paid for by the rich. You don't need to read a Time Magazine cover story to untangle this political strategy. Now that he has been given a second term, Obama needs to deliver the goods by raising taxes on the rich and only the rich. He will be "asking" them to pay their "fair share," (as if "asking" and "fairness" have anything to do with it). In reality the wealthy already pay taxes at a much higher rate than average Americans and in many cases will now have to pay more than half of their income in federal, state, and local taxes.

While most people would assume that the wealthy would chafe at such a heavy burden, some affluent individuals have apparently organized spontaneously to express their willingness to help the country. In interviews and articles, these self described "Patriotic Millionaires" have implored Congress and the President to raise their taxes. They claim they can easily afford to pay a little more to save the nation from fiscal insolvency. 

Conservative economists believe that an economy is most vibrant when as much money as possible is left in the private sector where it can be used for business investment and job growth. Left wing economists believe that government spending, which they term "investment," does more good. Through this lens, it's tempting to see the Patriotic Millionaires as well meaning Americans who have simply subscribed to a misguided economic philosophy. However, the reality may be far more sinister.

Daniel Berger, a spokesperson for the group, joined me last week on my radio show. Based on that highly charged and polarized discussion, it would be logical to conclude that the group is simply comprised of Democrat shills masquerading as patriots. Time and again Mr. Berger regurgitated Democratic talking points without the slightest ability to critically analyze his own positions. His goal was to simply create the impression that paying high taxes is patriotic. His hypocrisy was not hard to uncover.

1
Peter Schiff

Peter Schiff

An expert on money, economic theory, and international investing, Peter is a highly recommended broker by many leading financial newsletters and investment advisory services. He is also a contributing commentator for Newsweek International and served as an economic advisor to the 2008 Ron Paul presidential campaign.

Most Recent Articles

Join the Debate
11 Comments So Far
tzlotnitsky Wrote: Nov 22, 2012 10:16 AM
I am a membe of the group Patriotic Millionaires.My reason for joining the group is simple: I know that wealth in our society isn't generated by "job creation" but by consumption. No one in my position wakes up in the morning thinking about creating jobs per se; we respond to market forces. If consumers are buying, and demand is rising, we hire more. In order for my business to succeed, I need customers. My customers are ordinary Americans who buy everyday goods from the CPG companies and retailers that my company serves. In the wake of a reckless decade, it's time for serious solutions, not inflexible dogma. We can't cut our way to prosperity. A balanced approach, including people like me paying a bit more, is the only way to do it.
Tim583 Wrote: Nov 30, 2012 3:01 PM
Ok, In your business, say most of your customers are rich people. They now have less to spend (less consumption) because of higher taxes. Do you then hire more people or lay them off as a result of your customers spending less?

If it is a high end restaurant that the rich eat at; it is the wait staff that suffers with less hours and lower tips. But I guess they can get food stamps right?
gjmlb Wrote: Nov 21, 2012 8:08 PM
as the old saying goes,there is no such thing as a free lunch, eventually those who think there is
will be in for a sad surprise,the cost of which even includes loss of individual freedoms.and living
under an imposed ceiling put up by the Feds.
adrianvance Wrote: Nov 21, 2012 1:58 PM
Tax the rich and they go on vacation while the economy tanks. There is an optimum tax rate and it is about half of what we are now paying and 1/3 oft what the Democrats want.

Come see us at The Two Minute Conservative at: http:adrianvance.blogspot.com and when you speak ladies will swoon and liberal gentlemen will weep.
Rick 2811 Wrote: Nov 21, 2012 10:40 AM
To drive and validate your point even further is to simply look at Warren Buffet's rhetoric for supporting Obama's "taxing the rich" on the one hand, while fighting in court the idea he must pay an additional 3 million dollars (I believe about that...it's a lot} in taxes, on the other hand. Surely, Mr. Buffet knows the term hypocrisy. Or does he believe that, along with taxes, applies just to others ?
AKFred1 Wrote: Nov 21, 2012 12:29 PM
That's $3 million on top of his over $1billion in back taxes. While Mr. Buffet is smart he got a little to close to the kool-aid jar. He took a big gulp.
Roc1929 Wrote: Nov 21, 2012 8:37 AM
Since we’ve abandoned capitalism under the rule of law and replaced it with crony capitalism these people are setting themselves up to benefit from discriminatory enforcement of regulations and selective enforcement of the law.

Expect their numbers to grow until we return to being subjects being ruled by nobles: A ruling class.
Jay Wye Wrote: Nov 21, 2012 8:25 AM
Greg1084 Wrote: Nov 21, 2012 7:00 AM
Western Civilization is about to see the end-game of the "progressive movement".