President Obama is dividing America into two nations—one rich, the other increasingly poor with both more likely to elect Democrats.
In fairness, Obama inherited an economy not performing well even before the financial crisis. His recovery has managed only 2.4 percent growth; however, George Bush’s expansion accomplished about the same and then collapsed.
Since Bush took office, the U.S. economy has created only 4.7 million jobs—about 30,000 a month and less than one-fourth of those needed to keep pace with population growth.
Technology is important. The digital revolution and the consolidation of news and entertainment into the internet, cable, eBooks, and the like have canceled one million jobs.
Globalization is a culprit. American industry still boasts many of the best products and efficient factories but has shed 5 million jobs—far more than can be justified by rising productivity.
Manufacturing has enjoyed a small renaissance but has recouped only one in nine lost jobs, because Bush and Obama poorly enforced trade agreements that apply to principal competitors. China, Japan and Germany systematically maintain currency advantages and barriers that artificially under price their products and block our exports.
Obama has unilaterally imposed environmental and energy policies that needlessly raise costs and penalize competitiveness.
Increasingly workers are divided into two groups.
Those with diplomas from elite universities rely less on sinking U.S. fortunes and more on global markets for their services, or who can simply manipulate markets. Big wealth is concentrated on Wall Street, the Silicon Valley, and Hollywood, and players with monopoly power—like the NFL and your local cable operator.
The rest of America goes without a job or languishes with sinking wages waiting on the new elite in restaurants and hotels.
One-in-six men between the ages of 25 and 54 have no jobs, few prospects for finding one, and are increasingly supported by their wives.
Contrary to the cynical alibis of Democratic politicians and feminists, this is not a choice made possible by greater gender equity. During the William Clinton years, when both women and the overall economy made strong gains, the percent of prime-age men working increased, but since has declined precipitously.
Non-elite males don’t vote for Democrats and certainly are not likely to vote for Hilary Clinton, so Obama happily pursues policies that marginalize and make them despondent.
In Other News: Verizon Releases Statement on FCC’s “1930’s Era Regulations” in Morse Code | Michael Schaus
In Other News: Wasserman-Schultz Planned Attack on "Sexist" Obama for Considering New DNC Chair | Michael Schaus