Dave Camp in the House and David Vitter in the Senate are looking to address the implicit subsidy granted to banks designated as too big to fail. These banks are able to borrow at lower than true market rates because they are backed by the US taxpayer. Their smaller competitors who do not have this taxpayer financed guarantee must borrow at higher rates and so are at even more of a disadvantage versus the big guys. Over time this means that capital will increasingly move from small banks to large. (This is just one of the problems with Dodd-Frank.)
This undermines the very foundation of the marketplace and our economy.
Perhaps Camp and Vitter can figure something out, but it will be tough. The big banks dump piles and piles of money into the coffers of members of Congress on both sides of the aisle.
(From The Washington Post)
“Eliminating the megabanks federal handouts is a simple matter of common sense,” Vitter recently said. “Megabanks have been growing at a rapid pace since the financial meltdown, largely on the backs of U.S. taxpayers.”
Neither Vitter nor Camp could be considered liberal sympathizers. Rather, their interests in ending big bank subsidies center on a key Republican tenet of protecting the free-market economy. Subsidies create market distortions that fly in the face of that tenet.
Still, a vast majority of Republicans are unlikely to jump on the too-big-to-fail bandwagon. The securities and investment industry pumps millions of dollars into the party’s coffers, handing $3.5 million to the National Republican Congressional Committee this election cycle, according to Center for Responsive Politics.
Read more at Against Crony Capitalism.org
In Other News: Can We Ask Al Qaeda for a Refund on the Bowe Bergdahl Prisoner Swap? | Michael Schaus