With the March 1 sequester just around the corner, Alan Simpson(R) and Erskine Bowles (D) are resurfacing with a new take on their fiscal commission’s budget plan from 2010. How this planned revision will go over remains to be seen.
The last time Simpson-Bowles was the topic of discussion, both Republicans and Democrats had issues because of the deep cuts and revenue increases. Barak Obama all but dismissed it and did not even attempt to take the suggestions into consideration.
The new revision which surfaced this week proposes to cut the U.S. deficit by 2.4 trillion dollars over 10 years with a combination of spending cuts, tax reform, and a healthcare overhaul. One-fourth of the 2.4 trillion in deficit reduction would come from healthcare reforms and another fourth from tax reform. The rest would come from mandatory spending cuts, lower interest payments and a tougher cap on discretionary spending. It also tackles Social Security and its solvency. All in all the plan would try to keep the nation’s debt under 70 percent of gross domestic product in a decade, and to keep lowering it in the following years.
Let’s face it. If the sequester goes into effect, the spending cuts will be a drop in the bucket toward solving the real problem. What Washington needs to do is “man-up” for once and take some of the suggestions from Simpson-Bowles and put them into action. After all, Obama appointed them to come up with a solution.
However, it looks like Simpson and Bowles are just talking to a brick wall. On Fox Business Channel, Dagen Mcdowell and Connell McShane said that these two guys were leading a two man parade, with Dagen adding, “As my dad would say, it’s a pretty sorry parade.” That seems to be the case, with neither the Democrats nor Republicans willing to sit down and actually put some of these measures in place.
Open Letter to Obama and Congress From Internet Giants Calls For Reining In Government Surveillance | Nick Sorrentino
(An important interview) Saving the Net from the surveillance state (And Crony Media): Glenn Greenwald speaks up (Q&A) | Nick Sorrentino