The California hit parade keeps on rolling as yet Another California city scrambles to avoid bankruptcy.

Atwater, a city of roughly 28,000 in California's Central Valley, may declare a fiscal emergency as soon as next week, but it is trying to avoid becoming the fourth California city to file for municipal bankruptcy this year, its mayor said.

Under California law, a local government must either declare a "fiscal emergency" or go through a 60-to-90 day confidential negotiation process with its creditors before it files for municipal bankruptcy. Since late June, three Golden State cities-Stockton, San Bernardino and Mammoth Lakes-have filed for bankruptcy protection.

"We are planning to stay current on our ... bonds," said Mayor Carol Joan Faul in a telephone interview with Dow Jones Newswires. "We are hoping to avoid" bankruptcy, she said, "but as far as I'm concerned, we may have to declare a fiscal emergency" on Oct. 3.

According to its fiscal 2011 financial statement, Atwater had roughly $95 million in outstanding debt, a mixture of bonds related to its sewer as well its now-defunct redevelopment agency. Ms. Faul said Atwater intends to make an upcoming bond payment of $2 million on its sewer bonds.

Atwater is Burnt Toast

Once things reach this stage, one does not even need to look at the details because it's a done deal.

Yet, I did look further and as expected, public unions appear to be smack in the middle of things as noted in a Reuters article on Potential Atwater Bankruptcy.
1
Mike Shedlock

Mike Shedlock

Mike Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for Sitka Pacific Capital Management.

Most Recent Articles

Join the Debate
40 Comments So Far
« Previous1Next »
Jerome49 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 4:29 PM
C'mon Governor Moonbeam, raise the state income tax another 10 or 15 percentage points.(maybe even another 25 points for millionaires). You can't have your cities continually filing bankruptcy, now can you? Show some guts Jerry, make the tough call, raise those taxes. And while you're at it, give all your state employees a big raise.
Wumingren Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 12:40 AM
Burnt toast can be scraped, but it still tastes burnt afterward. When you burn toast, you can try to disguise it with peanut butter, but it's still burnt. In the end, you end up tossing the bread and the peanut butter you put on it. Good money after bad is the Lib-prog way. Union teachers? Burnt toast. Union autoworkers? Burnt toast. Union city workers? Burnt toast. All is burnt toast! Throw them all out and get a fresh loaf of bread.
David4 Wrote: Sep 29, 2012 11:08 PM
The two shoes that have not dropped: 1) bankers and the bond market scrutinize borrowers more closely for creditworthiness, and cut off more would-be borrowers; the so-called "contagion effect".
2) The government lending units, such as FNMA or the Fed, also refuse to lend to deadbeats.

The solution is a balanced budget. It had better be within the ability of payers to pay, or the place will become a dead-zone.
Jerome49 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 4:33 PM
That's okay. Just recently one California city sold bonds to raise $100,000 million and agreed to pay back $1 billion (yes, that's B illion) over 40 years. See, it's easy raising money.
lastman Wrote: Sep 29, 2012 10:09 PM
And they will probably sell to union owned companies, thus completing the shakedown.
Joseph1790 Wrote: Sep 29, 2012 5:52 PM
I know what will revive these failing Municpalities. Taxe increases and a healthy dose of new regulations. Additionally, they need to make it more lucrative to sit home and remain idle. Yes, I'm quite sure thats the prescription.....a more liberal agenda
natch Wrote: Sep 29, 2012 3:07 PM
I'm not so sure that screwing the bond holder by defaulting on payments is the most advisable way to go. Government, both state and federal, has gone way off the rails in its spending. Plumping up the workers on benefits and pay is a disservice to the private sector or in the words of Trey Gowdy (R-SC ), "mind-numbingly stupid." It is imperative that We the People have to take our government back. The power to tax is the power to destroy and as our bankruptcy filings have shown the destruction has begun.
Charles SWVA Wrote: Sep 29, 2012 4:36 PM
Screw the bondholders. They don't have to eat and the people do. Anybody dumb enough to lend money to a municipality in any state deserves it. Politicians and the unions are hand-in-glove in raping taxpayers and lenders.
Wumingren Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 12:46 AM
This is why years ago I instructed my financial advisor to divest my portfolios of all municipal holdings. Sure, they are tax free, and the liability at the time was not so bad, but I absolutely refused to be an enabler. The clowns sell bonds so they can spend beyond their means, then turn around and make the residents foot the bill. No, I will not give booze to a drunk. Cities are beyond hope when they are run by Lib-progs.
Blair31 Wrote: Sep 29, 2012 12:41 PM
10% through furloughs is a start but why not have EVERYBODY, including police and fire, take a pay
cut?
tgwWhale Wrote: Sep 29, 2012 3:50 PM
If Atwater is like just about every other bankrupt municipality or state, the problem is likely not the salaries paid to the workers. It is the "legacy costs" of retiree pensions and health care plus entitlement costs mandated on them.

If you cut salaries, you might put off the day of reckoning, but legacy costs will sink you in the end.
msnider Wrote: Sep 29, 2012 12:40 PM
Unless Taxifornia is split up into two or three states with major changes the whole state will soon be in Federal Receivership.
tgwWhale Wrote: Sep 29, 2012 3:48 PM
If you split up CA into three you will probably end up with three bankrupt states instead of one, and worse, six liberal senators instead of two.

Keep 'em, the way they are.
Wumingren Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 12:48 AM
I've been saying the same thing ever since the idiot idea was first gained public knowledge.
Jerome49 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 4:42 PM
Give it back to the Mexicans. That's one way to eliminate their illegal alien problem and the cost of their maintenance. Put it back on the shoulders of Mexico. I don't want to pay one red cent in taxes to bailout these bozos.
Mag14 Wrote: Sep 29, 2012 11:49 AM
"...who gave up 10 percent of pay last year through furloughs..."

Wait. I realize that people who are furloughed aren't the ones who chose it but if you're told to come to work less often but paid the same hourly rate you are not in any way giving up money.

The only way you would give up 10 percent is if you worked the same hours but got paid 10 percent less.

This is not to say that they have no right to complain, but they should complain accurately.
rblack sr. Wrote: Sep 29, 2012 11:25 AM
The evidence has become abundantly clear that when Statists control the government, financial responsibility goes straight into the toliet. That bit of bad news is compunded by Unions that use the ruse of claiming that they are fighting for the middle class in order to get better and better benefits for their members. May not be the case in this instance but is commonly so in most others suffering from pernicious strangualtion. Atwater will not be the last Cali city to go bankrupt, there will be many more before it's all said and done. The stealing of public funds and the thuggery of Unions will be the leading factors in California's demise as a Mecca of oppoertunity and freedom.
Jerome49 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 4:53 PM
No one wants to buy union made products and services if there is a cheaper alternative. How many union members buy only union made goods and services produced in America? My guess is less than 5%. Union workers are shopping for non-union made products that come from China at Wal-Mart and K-Mart and CostCo, They want to pay the lowest prices possible, just like everyone else. Then they wonder why all their jobs are being lost to China. The only 'middle-class' people the unions are concerned about are themselves. And then they want to complain about businesses and corporations being greedy.
EdinNola Wrote: Sep 29, 2012 10:45 AM
If you believe Bush had ANYTHING to do with our current worldwide
financial crisis, you owe it to yourself to go to www.gov-truth.com and
download "Siren's Song - America's Betrayal". It may be the most important thing you can read today. Spread the truth. Pass this site along to your friends. [Rev. 3 - 9/28/12 is now online]
true liberal Wrote: Sep 29, 2012 9:46 AM
Ahhh more Caifornia dreaming ...

The whole state is in dire straits and they really are reaching the tipping point.

We have to remember that California is not too big to fail. Maybe after they default better managed states can buy them up for pennies on the dollar.
ReddestNeck Wrote: Sep 29, 2012 12:41 PM
Jerome49 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 4:59 PM
California is the 'granola' state, filled with fruits, nuts and flakes. I say let them sleep in the bed they made. After all, they have Pelosi, Boxer, Finestein and Moonbeam to lead them to the promised land and Hollywood to pay for it. You now know why California legalized pot. If they can just keep everyone stoned, they won't mind being reduced to third world status.
XLR8R Wrote: Sep 29, 2012 9:45 AM
Welcome to union control of public budgets!
Public employee unions are illegal and immoral, they do not belong, private, for profit industry yes but taxpayer funded they are at odds with governments goals and requirements.
They are motivated by larger paychecks and more benefits not by efficiencies, service and quality!
They just don't belong!
So, thanks unions for your destructive behavior towards our State, Counties, Cities and most of all our schools!
ReddestNeck Wrote: Sep 29, 2012 12:41 PM
he who robs peter to pay paul can always count on the enthusiastic support of paul.
Jerome49 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 5:03 PM
Don't thank the unions, thank the money grubbing politicians that took the union campaign contributions and votes and allowed public sector employees to unionize.
Floyd35 Wrote: Sep 29, 2012 8:50 AM
Another bank goes bankrupt, another business closes its doors. That is a sure sign that the DREAM BUSTERS are hard at work. They work to cause you nightmares while they get rich themselves. They lie, cheat, and insider trade. They force Obamcare on you and keep fuel prices high due to their stupid regulations. Foreign countries take your money and use it to buy weapons to kill Americans with....thanks to.... the DREAM BUSTERS.

Who are they? You know! They are Obama/Biden, and the Democrats, and the Liberal News Media. With friends (feinds) like them who needs enemies?
Jerome49 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 5:13 PM
Yeah, but are there enough of us left who pay taxes to out-vote those who are getting the "redistribution"? 8% or 15% unemployment may be unacceptable to some of the unemployed, but I doubt it matters to the 85% who are employed. Tax increases don't seem to matter to the 47% of American workers who don't pay income taxes. Most don't have a clue what a $16 trillion of $26 trillion national debt means. Most couldn't tell you what Quantitative Easings 1, 2 and 3 were, orwhat impact it will have on them. I hope I'm wrong, but there may not be enough of us to stop the insanity.
K.R.2 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 6:09 PM
Most of them don't even know there is a difference between million, billion or trillion. They just know it is more than whatever they have.
jwilson804 Wrote: Sep 29, 2012 8:36 AM
California is a far left liberal state that like Obama and the rest of the liberal democtats,loves to spend other peoples money.They have known for years that they were in trouble but kept spending like there was no tomorrow. Now they are in deep trouble and I have no pity for them what-so-ever. Obama is doing the very same thing to our country and if we don't wake-up and vote him out of office,we will be just like Greece. Does that appeal to anyone???
Wumingren Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 12:50 AM
It isn't pity I feel for them; it is outrage. For as sure as I'm sitting here typing this response, the Lib-progs in Washington are drafting bailouts for the flagging Lib-prog states.
Jerome49 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 5:19 PM
It won't be long before Illinois follows suit. tTe Democrats and those pretending to be Republicans have lined their pockets and sold out the taxpayers to the unions and minorities for their campaign contributions and votes. Obama learned his 'Chicago Way' politics in the most corrupt state in the union. It's no mystery why Illinois is broke and given a little more time, Obama will be able to bring the USA down to par with Illinois.
silvereagle Wrote: Sep 29, 2012 8:24 AM
The mere idea of cutting spending and lowering/revamping the tax code is, to this administration, akin to taking cyanide. It will kill their ideological belief that Keynesian economics works in the overall for the "collective" not only at the national level but at the state, county and local levels as well. Collective bargaining by public unions is a socialist concept that should have never have been permitted. Even FDR was opposed because he knew it would lead to the people of the US being "held hostage" by the unions thereby resulting in a bad ending. Looking at what's happening in the country today with public sector unions, he was exactly right.
Greg1084 Wrote: Sep 29, 2012 6:59 AM
Stuff like this is why the latest QE by the Bernanke is focused on the secondary mortgage market. They think if they can pump some colloid into the corpse that is the housing market and try that new defibrillator they can somehow push property values up and restore property tax revenue lost to lowering property values. The only way it can work is if an inflation sets in that is not high enough to be ruinous and young people can be persuaded to buy. Good luck with that. Young folks are unemployed and are indentured to their universities. Most new jobs are going to people my age who are getting ready to retire, and we aren't about to get suckered in again after losing huge chunks of retirement savings in real estate bubbles.
Colonialgirl Wrote: Sep 29, 2012 3:17 PM
They'd be better off IF they used all those "stimulus funds" to pay off the mortgages of hose who are making their payments but underwater on the value. That would free up around $700 a month for me to contribute to the economy buying stuff I want and taking vacations.
Right now it takes almost all of my SS check to pay the house payment.
Jerome49 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 5:49 PM
Should the taxpayers also have to payoff your car loan because you owe more on your car than it's worth? My wife and I did without vacations and "buying stuff" so we could have our mortgage paid off by the time we turned 65 and retired. Now, you want my tax money to payoff your mortgage so you don't have to go without vacations and stuff? Wake up. Nobody owes you a living.
Jerome49 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 5:39 PM
Property tax wasn't lost due to lower property values. My property tax bills have been higher in each of the last four years. when I complained that my home value has dropped, the county assessor said it doesn't matter as the government agencies funded by my property taxes (Primarily public schools) needed more money each year, so that even if the value of my property dropped, the county had to increase the "multiplier" on the lower value in order to fund all the government agencies whose expenditures went up each year. God forbid the teachers, county workers and other municipal agency workers didn't get a raise.
« Previous1Next »