He could be both. Romney may be far better than Obama, but that is beside the point.
The point is ethanol from corn makes no sense. Ethanol from corn costs energy to produce and is only viable because of government subsidies. Ethanol from sugar cane makes sense, but the US has tariffs on Brazilian ethanol in order to support inefficient, energy wasting ethanol from corn.
Remove Tariffs, Legalize Hemp
Want to lower gas prices? Then remove tariffs on ethanol.
If you want biofuels, then legalize hemp.
Hemp needs no fertilizer, its fiber is softer than cotton, its seeds high in oil content, and it grows on poor soil.
Those are admirable properties. Does that make hemp viable for biofuels? I suspect so, but to be truthful, I just don't know. What I do know is if we get government subsidies out of the way and end needless regulation, the free market will find a way.
Get Rid of Big Government
Republican candidates ought to be supporting free market, small government policies. Instead, it is very disheartening to see Romney pandering to Iowa voters on the same big government subsidy side as president Obama.
Mike "Mish" Shedlock
See also these top columnists
Obama Goes Doh!-for-97, 98, 99, 100!: John Ransom
RomneyCare for Farmers: Mike Shedlock
America's Culture of Inventiveness Stuffs Obama: Mark Baisley
A Visit to Those Who Died on the River Kwai: Joe Schaefer
Mmm, a Prescription for Kool Aid: Bill Tatro
Let's Deal With Job Losses: Michelle Singletary
IRS Approves Tax Credits for Dead People: Ken Harney
Obama's Energy Policy and Flyover Country: Lincoln Brown
Email, Hate Mail and Comments from Readers: John Ransom
Eric Cantor's 5% Growth Strategy: Larry Kudlow
(An important interview) Saving the Net from the surveillance state (And Crony Media): Glenn Greenwald speaks up (Q&A) | Nick Sorrentino