You would think $1 trillion in spending stimulus and $2.5 trillion of Fed pump-priming would produce an economy a whole lot stronger than 1.9 percent GDP, which was the revised first-quarter number. And you’d think all that government spending would deliver a whole lot more jobs than 69,000 in May.
 
But it hasn’t happened.
 
The Keynesian government-spending model has proven a complete failure. It’s the Obama model. And it has produced such an anemic recovery that frankly, at 2 percent growth, we’re back on the front end of a potential recession. If anything goes wrong -- like another blow-up in Europe -- there’s no safety margin to stop a new recession.
 
And that brings us to the grim May employment report, which generated only 69,000 nonfarm payrolls. It’s the third consecutive subpar tally, replete with downward revisions for the two prior months. It’s a devastating number for the American economy, and a catastrophic number for Obama’s reelection hopes. All momentum on jobs and the economy has evaporated.
 
Inside the May report, the data is just as bad. The unemployment rate rose slightly from 8.1 to 8.2 percent. The so called U6 unemployment rate, tracking the marginally employed or completely discouraged, increased to 14.8 percent from 14.5 percent. And labor earnings are barely rising at 1.7 percent over the past year, almost in line with the inflation rate. In fact, through April, after-tax, after-inflation income is scarcely rising at 0.6 percent for the past year.
 
The private workweek also fell in May. So did the manufacturing workweek and aggregate hours worked for all employees. The small-business household survey did rise, but that follows declines in the prior two months.
 
Barack Obama doesn’t get this, but businesses create jobs. And firms have to be profitable in order to hire. Yet the president is on the campaign trail criticizing Mitt Romney by degrading the importance of profits. Huh?
 
Without profits businesses can’t expand. And if they don’t expand, they can’t hire. And if they don’t have profitable rates of return, they’re not going to attract new capital for investment.
 
Which brings us to a couple of important reasons for the virtual freeze in hiring.
 
First there’s the fiscal tax cliff. If all the Bush tax rates go up, incentives will go down and liquidity will leave the system. You can’t pick up a newspaper these days and not find a story about how the fiscal cliff is elevating uncertainty and slowing U.S. growth. House Speaker
1
Larry Kudlow

Larry Kudlow

Lawrence Kudlow is host of CNBC’s “The Kudlow Report,” which airs nightly from 7 p.m. to 8 p.m.

Most Recent Articles

Join the Debate
54 Comments So Far
« Previous1Next »
Hisemiester Wrote: Jun 03, 2012 6:27 PM
The USA cannot compete against China. Labor won't allow it. Unions demand too much and most union workers will not go 110% for the money they make. Eight hour day equals to approx. five hours of work.
D G Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 2:05 PM
Eight years ago, GWB had been president for 3 1/2 years and was running for re-election. His stimulus was Tax Relief 2003, and it was working. Then unemployment rate for May 2004 was 5.6 and was on an improving trend.

Now, Obama is running for re-election with unemployment at 8.2% and worsening. Obama's Porkulus was a terrible failure.

GWB was re-elected. BHO will not be re-elected.
Account closed Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 3:03 PM
Bush was a proud American who surrounded himself with sharp, disciplined advisers. Obama is, well, an embarrassment. An empty shell. A walking advertisement for the vacuousness of Socialism.
Paperpushermj Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 1:51 PM
Can we finally admit that keynesian Economics is a failure and only appeals to the Governing Class because it tells them to Spend.
Account closed Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 8:38 PM
It's never worked anywhere
requiescat in pace Wrote: Jun 04, 2012 12:52 PM
Of course, the Keynesian model failied in the past---in the Third World and Western European but this nation elected a Kenyan, er...Keynesian model advocate in 2008.
If we allow the Lapdog Media to uncritically package its Leftist Messenger again, we will elect another one----a very dangerous trend.
PhillupSpace2 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 1:46 PM
America is a free enterprise zone. Sell your vote to Obama for some food stamps, subsidized housing, cheap student loans, free health care "Free Bread and Circuses; (You remember how that turned out for them)

No one in the world wants to buy our production or our labor at the prices we think they are worth! We seem to be priced out of the world market and now have only ourselves as a customersw for our goods and services. Amity Shales can tell you how well that worked out in the 1930s. All should read "The Forgotten Man". (Its just a little book, you can manage that.)
Perhaps to some, Obama seems to be about the only buyer out there now.
Daddio7 Wrote: Jun 03, 2012 3:55 AM
We do not have ourselves as customers. Did an American company make your car, your television, your wardrobe? How much Mexican labor is went into building your house, picking the produce you buy, cutting your grass? Start paying Americans to make your stuff and provide the services you want and maybe they will have enough money to buy what you make.
Moonbat Exterminator Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 12:07 PM
Your final paragraph contains a lesson that should be learned from history. Preceeding Reagan were a two term moderate Repub(Nixon) and a hard left one term Dem(Carter). During the 70s we experienced the phenomenon of stagflation, a combination of high unemployment and inflation along with anemic GDP growth. Also during that decade the DJIA churned around in a narrow trading range. Today looks fighteningly similar to the 70s except for the music which sucks today in comparison. In the interim, politicians have figured ways to jigger the stats to make the economy look artificially better than it really is, making apples to apples comparisons more difficult, but 2012 could well be 1980 all over again if we're lucky.
Blair31 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 11:53 AM
Cut $10 trillion dollars from budget.
SteveandJag Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 12:06 PM
How? The Budget isn't that big to start with. It's only $4T.
Paperpushermj Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 1:55 PM
How? Starve Government of Money. Let Department Heads figure out what should be cut.
king10 - formerly king Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 2:21 PM
I loved the word "only" in your response stevejagoff
Account closed Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 10:37 AM
Since PonziCare was passed, my premiums have doubled - and BCBS said it was because of our first gay president's Utopian dream of destroying free enterprise (my editorializing) and making his friends billionaires. So for me, I have $1,500 to $2,000 less to spend each year. Now multiply that by 250 million and you get a drain on the economy of an extra half trillion dollars - EACH YEAR. Where is that money going?

Only Obama and his bloated bureaucratic friends know, but it's a good bet a bunch is making its way to Swiss bank accounts held by CEOs of Pfizer, AARP and all the other companies that benefit handsomely from PonziCare -and insulate the MSM by purchasing mega blocks of ad time on their news programs.
Account closed Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 10:38 AM
So if I and other Americans have half a trillion less to spend on food, TVs and cars, people have to be laid off by those providers.

It's called a "Grand Experiment" that began with a healthy economy, but that is slowly sucking the life out of free enterprise. Thank God we have the Hawaiian version of Jeff Spicoli (Fast Times at Ridgemont High) a high school doper with no knowledge of America or economics to guide us through this destruction of the American Way.
Kevin 354 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 12:33 PM
This just in from the administration: "It isn't a Ponzi Scheme because it is a Ponzi Scheme on steroids and we can now adjust the dose."
Pat1392 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 9:57 AM
I think the report is worse than they say---I remember an ad from the 2004 campaign with a middle-aged white guy complaining that the jobs Bush was talking about were low paying jobs.
Why we are not talking about who was really driving the car that went off the ditch( Reid/Pelosi)
and the fact that Clinton, Obama, and McCain were all occupants is beyond me.
jb80538 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 9:27 AM
Not much will change in terms of jobs until the we have a new occupant in the WH
DirtyDaveyDownEast Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 9:04 AM
Hello. I'm DirtyDaveyDownEast & I believe we can build a bettah brightah future for all AMERICANS. Despite tha 'bama bum's belief in tha ressurrection, Keyens is dead ! Long live Free Enterprize ! ! !

AMERICA, tha Greatest Nation Evah, needs ta undah go a 3rd Great Awakening. Just as tha 1st 2 Great Awakenings enabled AMERICA ta throw off tha tyrannies of 1st foreign rule then slavery; only GOD can deliver us from E-V-I-L O-B-A-M-A ! ! !

Ayah!
Macroman Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 9:00 AM
At the end of January 2009, when the arrogant, ignorant. sophomoric communist now occupying the White House took office, the unemployment rate was 7.8%. Our new president told us the unemployment rate would exceed 8% if we didn't adopt his stimulus package. We adopted it. How'd it do? The unemployment rate went above 8% in February 2009. It has not come below 8% in a single month since then. Wow! More than 8% unemployment every single month the guy's been in office. That worked out well, didn't it? And this narcissistic economic moron, who never had a real job in his life, has the nerve to criticize Romney's job-creation record. Throw the bum out!
Pat1392 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 11:04 AM
But........he keeps blaming Bush and the mess he inherited from him. And no one calls Obama on it.
bobbit Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 12:20 PM
Not to mention that the 8% figure is pure BS!
SteveL2 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 8:41 AM
Kudlow: "You would think $1 trillion in spending stimulus and $2.5 trillion of Fed pump-priming would produce an economy a whole lot stronger than 1.9 percent GDP"

No, I did NOT think that.
And I was right not to think that.
SteveL2 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 8:51 AM
Right now, Uncle Sam is like Terri Schaivo was: A living vegetable, comatose, being kept alive by artificial life support.

If the Fed lowered the money supply, our economy would collapse. It's being kept barely alive by $15 trillion in debt.

And that's pretty much where the U.S. was in 1937 too, despite FDR's nostrums. It was only his military buildup which really started to put Americans back to work. And of course, once war broke out, drafting 16 million men into the military reduced demand for civilian jobs too.
Daddio7 Wrote: Jun 03, 2012 4:05 AM
All war economy was just stimulus spending on steroids. You know, dig a hole, fill it in, build a plane, shoot it down. We had food and gasoline rationing. Actual economic growth only started after the war when we began to rebuild Europe.
Cartwright Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 8:06 AM
It's as if Obama is so stupid, he's killing his own re-election chances, as he kills jobs and the economy. And while Clinton presided over an economic boom, and loves to take credit for it, it was more the result of the Republican's Contract with America.
PatrickHenry1720 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 7:30 AM
The Federal Reserve Bank with its issuance of fake currency has pulled the biggest ponzi scheme this country has ever seen. A fake debt black hole that Americans are supposed to be signed onto.

Check out:

www.constitutionliberty. com

Sign up for the Newsletter!

Thanks.
rauljg6 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 7:28 AM
The keynsian model worked. It got us out of the biggest rescission in 6 months. A recession that was 3 times bigger then originally thought everything was better....market, GDP,, job losses of 750000 changed to actual job growth...but then 2010 came around tea party took over we extend bush tax cuts we begin austerity measures at the state level...tea party blocks any other type of stimulus...and the economy and the recovery slowly flattens out. Don't revise history. Huge recession under GOP, quick but not strong recovery, tea party takeover and extension of GOP policies and recovery is slow.
Joseph1790 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 8:01 AM
Nice try, but we actually had an average of 5% unemployment under Bush and about 3% GDP growth. We have added 5 trillion in debt since then. What is the unemployment rate and how fast are we growing?
SteveL2 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 8:48 AM
Which do you think had more effect: Obama's bailouts of public employee unions, or the Federal Reserve pumping over TWO TRILLION DOLLARS of liquidity into the economy?

Because there is a good argument to be made that if the Federal Reserve had pumped another $800 billion into the economy, then Obama didn't need to do anything and he could have remained a useless figurehead--a job description that suits him much better than "Commander in Chief."
Kevin 354 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 9:48 AM
Raul, The recession ended in June, 2009. The Keynes model would have called for cuts in taxes and government spending, and for a balanced budget at this time.
bobbit Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 12:17 PM
Simply a delusional view of recent history. If I hear one more libdrool speak of us coming out of the recession I may have a stroke. How can anyone when looking at the numbers as well as the world around them believe we have come out of the recession?
Frank130 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 7:08 AM
1. "The Keynesian government-spending model has proven a complete failure." Yes, but that hasn't stopped big government from trying more of the same since creation of the Fed in 1913. As debt levels rise, more stimulus spending in times of economic downturns benefit less & less until more spending causes more harm than good. We are at that point now of more harm, not help. The best solution now is cutting spending (not increasing spending) to balance the budget asap to halt the rising debt levels.
2. "Where’s the corporate tax reform that would lower rates and broaden the base and end the double-taxation of the overseas profits of American companies?" Yes, that would help enormously also.
rauljg6 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 7:30 AM
Taxes were lowered by bush and the current economy is still operating under those taxes policies. Why didn't they work as promised? And why would you now think lowering would work more if it didnt doesn't work now??
SteveL2 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 8:46 AM
If they didn't work, then why did Obama agree to extend them?

Remember? Last August, you left-wingers were furious that Obama agreed to extend the Bush tax cuts for another year.

So go argue with him. He's YOUR president, not mine.
Joesolis Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 10:06 AM
Raul, what happened was a stealth tax hike on businesses by the newly elected Democrat majorities in 2007. Tax hike? You may say, what tax hike? Answer: the stealth tax hike called the Minimum Wage Increase. When that went into effect, Local businesses started to layoff employees be cause they couldn't afford the required pay increases. I personally know two families who lost their homes when one of the spouses lost their jobs as a direct result of the minimum wage increase. Multiply that by thousands across the country and its easy to see how the housing market collapsed. One more example of how Liberal policies tend to hurt the very people they're supposed to help.
David70 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 7:02 AM
So, real out of work percent is actually north of 20%. Obozo is about to have his hind part delivered to his North Shore door step (:-0) my oh my........
Egonm206 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 6:30 AM
"The Europeans should guarantee all bank deposits, interbank loans, and bank debt until this story is straightened out. But they’re not. So the problem festers."

By "Europeans" you mean the Germans, right ? There is no way Germans will subsidize most of the freeloading Greeks, Italians, Spaniards etc. even if it were politically feasible.
My personal prediction is an implosion and collapse of the Euro sometime in the next year or so.
This will, of course, give Obama yet another excuse for his incredibly poor economic judgements.
SteveL2 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 8:45 AM
He already used that excuse in his speech yesterday.

I'm surprised he didn't cite the recent solar eclipse as another reason for our economic troubles.
PhillupSpace2 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 4:30 AM
I have told this before but will tell it again.

My first effort at student teaching caused me some concern so I asked my Prof. for advice. He said, "PITCH IT LOW!" Larry I would pass that along to you and the financial wizards at TH.

This article, like most is written for a peer group who know all the nuances. You are not the best communicators!
Just today, we are treated to this eye opener from Potrykus:
"According to the Int'l Adult Literacy Survey, 25% of men in the US cannot locate information in written text- They can't read a bottle of pills to find out how many pills to take!
Here is something all would understand: Population growth adds 122,000 eligible workers monthly; 69,000 were hired!
rchuang1654 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 1:01 AM
Anyone who's read up on the Great Depression noted that many of FDR's New Deal policies actually _extended_ the Great Depression. It was said that if left to natural economic forces, the USA would have been out of the Great Depression by 1936 anyway, because investors would have made a financial "killing" by buying and selling so much highly-depressed stocks anyway (look at one Joseph P. Kennedy, the patriarch of the Kennedy clan; he bought a lot of company stock and "distressed" at highly depressed prices and made a gigantic financial profit by the late 1930's).

It's time we streamline government in both size and number of regulations and MASSIVELY overhaul income taxation to provide a huge boost to the US economy.
David70 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 7:04 AM
Or, put a Free Market conservative in the Oval Office!
Carlos7 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 12:34 AM
"The Keynesian government-spending model has proven a complete failure"

You can say that again!

"The Keynesian government-spending model has proven a complete failure"
oldnjal Wrote: Jun 01, 2012 11:19 PM
Have been beating the same drum, ad nauseum, for a while.
When Wisconsin, Haley's,Perry's and Jindal's states add jobs, because of a positive business climate, and putting off the money-laundering unions, our community organizer claims these jobs as the result of his actions.
When oil is developed and pipelines laid, that, being on private lands, his Czars cannot hinder, he then claims credit for jobs and North Dakota oil.
Shall I join the word-smiths and call our community organizer disengenious?(However that word is spelled). Not really familiar with it. Prefer liar.
Rosemary2 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 4:26 AM
RHSimard Wrote: Jun 01, 2012 11:00 PM
"...without profits businesses can’t expand"

Actually, that rather understates it. Without profits, for the most part, businesses cannot even exist. Nobody is going to put their own wealth into equity in businesses which don't earn profits to distribute as dividends and cannot be expected to sometime in the reasonably near future. Profit is to a business what wages are to an employee, the understood and required reward for what that entity contributes to the system-and no economy, regardless of how it's designed and managed, can work any other way...not as long as it remains the case that those with something to sell and those with the interest in buying it have the freedom to accept or reject what the other offers...supply and demand.
oldnjal Wrote: Jun 01, 2012 11:30 PM
And does anyone still believe our community organizer does not grasp the simple and beautifully expressed concepts, above?
He knows. He wants Big Government to decide what one will pay, and the other charge, to make it 'fair'. Social Justice, if you please.
This courteous expression that he does not understand business is exactly that.
He wants to control outcomes, because opportunity cannot be made 'fair'. Only God can make things 'fair' and if God is, or is not, still, no man should join with his fellow travelers and decide to do it.
'Those that would bring Heaven to Earth, invariable produce Hell'.
We have the un-rewritten History, now.

Let's be Scientific, then, and depend upon Luck. That is really intelligent.
SteveL2 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 8:43 AM
The Left believes that the private sector is a necessarily evil; businesses exist to provide jobs to workers.
Dancing Bear Wrote: Jun 01, 2012 5:37 PM
Wall Street is no longer about free enterprise but about gaining favors from D.C. And another quantitative easing? Ha Ha the U S of DUMB!
rchuang1654 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 1:03 AM
The Fed--noting that Obama is just about officially "toast"--may not implement another QE, noting that with a possible major income tax reform coming if Romney wins, we could see several TRILLION dollars in liquid assets arriving in the USA to bolster the US economy.
SteveL2 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 8:42 AM
The problem is we may not be able to wait that long.

The problems in Spain and Greece may cause the European Union to start disintegrating this summer. In which case the Fed will certainly do QE 3 in order to insulate the U.S. from this new economic shock.
Rammbo Wrote: Jun 01, 2012 4:53 PM
Am I the only person in Amerika who does not see this suspicious cycle that repeats itself every year now?
Once again, we start off the year with endless gobs of Pollyanna forecasts and silver lining assurances.00
Once again, We, The People, were set up for the fall. Wall Street LOVES days like this. They're counting on their customer/sucker to panic and sell them back shares at a lower price.
Sellers LOSE. Buyers WIN.
The Govt.-Media Complex reinforces the mirage. What a great an echo chamber to have at your disposal. All run by college-programmed Statist robots.
They're blaming it all on the Labor jobs report but the report is nothing new. Regions of this country that were vacated by "free" trade still have nothing to take their place.
oldnjal Wrote: Jun 01, 2012 11:55 PM
Shares are bought and sold by investors, educated and otherwise, and trying to run it all is not within the grasp of any group of Gordon Gecko types.
They do try. They get in the news, and in jail, sometimes.
But providing Capital, in our system, is so much better than other systems that our streets are filled with people speaking other languages, and the requests for visas and citizenship are ongoing. Nothing in un-rewritten History matches our story.
But Caveat Emptar,(however that is spelled).
Despite wealth, fine suits, and engaging smiles, both Politicians, and Stock sellers still seem rather like hucksters.
Rosemary2 Wrote: Jun 02, 2012 4:30 AM
« Previous1Next »