Immediately following the declaration of a cease-fire in Gaza, Egypt was plunged into a massive domestic crisis. Mohammed Morsi, elected in the first presidential election after the fall of Hosni Mubarak, passed a decree that would essentially neuter the independent judiciary by placing his executive powers above the high court and proposed changes to the constitution that would institutionalize the Muslim Brotherhood's power. Following the decree, Morsi's political opponents launched massive demonstrations that threw Egypt into domestic instability and uncertainty.

In the case of most countries, this would not be a matter of international note. But Egypt is not just another country. It is the largest Arab country and one that has been the traditional center of the Arab world. Equally important, if Egypt's domestic changes translate into shifts in its foreign policy, it could affect the regional balance of power for decades to come.

Morsi's Challenge to the Nasserite Model

The Arab Spring was seen by some observers to be a largely secular movement aimed at establishing constitutional democracy. The problem with this theory was that while the demonstrators might have had the strength to force an election, it was not certain that the secular constitutionalists would win it. They didn't. Morsi is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, and while there were numerous claims that he was a moderate member, it was simply not understood that he was a man of conviction and honor and that his membership in the Brotherhood was not casual or frivolous. His intention was to strengthen the role of Islam in Egypt and the control of the Muslim Brotherhood over the various arms of state. His rhetoric, speed and degree of Islamism might have been less extreme than others, but his intent was clear.

1
George Friedman

George Friedman

George Friedman is the CEO and chief intelligence officer of Stratfor, a private intelligence company located in Austin, TX.

Most Recent Articles

Join the Debate
4 Comments So Far
None1257 Wrote: Dec 07, 2012 1:05 PM
Whatever happens in Egypt, will that result in the end of the United States of America?
Jay Wye Wrote: Dec 07, 2012 9:06 PM
how shortsighted you are.
bob 24 Wrote: Dec 07, 2012 8:04 AM
See what supporting "democracy" got us in Egypt! Now the Muslim Brotherhood is gaining all over the region. We should have never invaded Iraq the second time. We should have left Sadaam in place. We should have supported Mubarak. We should stop playing policeman to the world. Now Iraq is in turmoil and is no longer a counter-balance to Iran. Not to mention all the money and lives lost. We should have never maintained a major war in Afghanistan. We should have gone in, blown up the Taliban and left. Maybe use it as a special forces training ground. Our military and government has been grossly mismanaged.
Jay Wye Wrote: Dec 07, 2012 9:11 PM
"we should have left Saddam in place" ? Weapons-Grade STUPID.
Saddam was no "counter-balance" to Iran. Iran still managed to commit terrorist attacks all around the world. Iran was working on nuclear weapons just as Saddam was. Iran was working on long-range missiles to deliver them and chemical/biological weapons too.
Comrade Hussein did not support Mubarak because he WANTED the Muslim Brotherhood to gain power,that's also why he intervened in Libya. ANYthing that weakens the US and lessens US power and influence,Comrade Hussein is for. He's the muslim Manchurian Candidate.