Russian President Vladimir Putin arrived in Israel on June 25 for his first state visit since retaking the presidency. The visit was arranged in mid-May, and so at least part of the agenda was set, given events in Syria and Egypt. The interesting thing about Israel and Russia is that while they seem to be operating in the same areas of interest and their agendas seem disconnected, their interests are not always opposed. It is easy to identify places they both care about but more difficult to identify ways in which they connect. It is therefore difficult to identify the significance of the visit beyond that it happened.

An example is Azerbaijan. Russia is still a major weapons provider for Azerbaijan, but the Israelis are now selling it large amounts of weapons and appear to be using it as a base from which to observe and, according to rumors, possibly attack Iran. Russia, which supports Armenia, a country Azerbaijan fought a war with in the late 1980s and early 1990s and technically still is at war with, ought to oppose Israel's action, particularly since it threatens Iran, which Russia does not want attacked. At the same time, Russia doesn't feel threatened by Israeli involvement in Azerbaijan, and Israel doesn't really care about Armenia. Both are there, both are involved and both think Azerbaijan is important, yet each operates in ways that ought to conflict but don't.

The same is true in the more immediate case of Syria, where its downing of a Turkish plane has created an unexpected dynamic for this visit. To think about this we need to consider Russian and Israeli strategy and its odd lack of intersection in Syria.

Russia's Need for a U.S. Distraction

1
George Friedman

George Friedman

George Friedman is the CEO and chief intelligence officer of Stratfor, a private intelligence company located in Austin, TX.

Most Recent Articles

Join the Debate
6 Comments So Far
2012Conservative Wrote: Jun 28, 2012 9:17 PM
There is a shared concern of both counties of
Islamist terrorists. Also, Syria (while no friend of Israel) is a secular
regime. If the leadership of Syria is thrown out, it likely will be replaced by an Islamist regime (that probably will persecute Alawites and Christians).
Blair31 Wrote: Jun 28, 2012 11:58 AM
Russia, and before it, the Soviet Union, has always supported the Arabs over the Jews. Russia won't
stop selling its MI-24 Hind D attack helicopters to Syria so that the corrupt Acien Regime of the Assads can continue massacring its own people, and sell uranium to Iran, so it can make a fast ruble.
William Gensert Wrote: Jun 28, 2012 8:36 AM
There are never many comments on Friedman's articles, which is surprising since they are the only true in-depth foreign policy analysis articles readily available today, delving into tactics and national interests and offering a perspective that never makes it into the regular press.

Anything with his byline or mentioning Stratfor, I always make sure I read. I don't always agree, but the articles never fail to inform. When I was in college, I always bought Foreign Affairs for its geopolitical analysis, but alas, they are a shadow of what they were decades ago. Time Magazine occasionally has a good article on Iran and the Middle East, but it’s only once and a while. Friedman can be counted on, and I respect his opinion.
William Gensert Wrote: Jun 28, 2012 8:37 AM
I think a great deal of the responsibility for Putin’s visit to Israel can be laid at Obama’s feet. The state of Israel is in an existential battle with Iran and he has been decidedly unsupportive.

With Barack Obama as President, they are suddenly friendless. They need to take any meeting that is offered, if only to know where the players stand.

At this point in time, the interests of Saudi Arabia and Israel miraculously intersect. The kingdom is also in a fight to the death with Iran and isn’t Syria really a proxy war between the Shiite and the Sunni?

Barring a non-aligned with Iran, non-radical state replacing the Assad regime, I’m all for destabilizing chaos, for Syria itself and Hezbollah their client in Lebanon.
William Gensert Wrote: Jun 28, 2012 8:37 AM
There are many players partaking in a proxy game of chess where Syria is the board and they are on one side against Israel and America -- even if the genius of Barack does not see it as such.

To paraphrase the immortal words of Henry Kissinger, it’s too bad they can’t all lose.

An intractable quagmire in Syria, removing it as a facilitator of Iranian hegemony could be a deciding factor in the coming conflagration of Iran versus America and Israel.
jb168 Wrote: Jun 28, 2012 7:24 AM
Very informative. And to add to the complexity of relationships in the region, it is interesting to note that the two fierce adversaries, Armenia and Azerbaidjian are separated by a religious divide: The former--which is essentially allied with Russia as opposed to Israel--is a Christian natiion, whereas Armenia--essentially allied with Israel as opposed to Russia--is a Muslim nation! Strange bedfellows indeed!