The Egyptian presidential election was held last week. No candidate received 50 percent of the vote, so a runoff will be held between the two leading candidates, Mohammed Morsi and Ahmed Shafiq. Morsi represented the Muslim Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice Party and received 25.3 percent of the vote, while Shafiq, a former Egyptian air force commander and the last prime minister to serve in Hosni Mubarak's administration, received 24.9 percent. There were, of course, charges of irregularities, but in general the results made sense. The Islamist faction had done extremely well in the parliamentary election, and fear of an Islamist president caused the substantial Coptic community, among others, to support the candidate of the old regime, which had provided them at least some security.

Morsi and Shafiq effectively tied in the first round, and either can win the next round. Morsi's strength is that he has the support of both the Islamist elements and those who fear a Shafiq presidency and possible return to the old regime. Shafiq's strength is that he speaks for those who fear an Islamist regime. The question is who will win the non-Islamist secularists' support. They oppose both factions, but they are now going to have to live with a president from one of them. If their secularism is stronger than their hatred of the former regime, they will go with Shafiq. If not, they will go with Morsi. And, of course, it is unclear whether the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, the military committee that has ruled Egypt since the fall of Mubarak, will cede any real power to either candidate, especially since the constitution hasn't even been drafted.

This is not how the West, nor many Egyptians, thought the Arab Spring would turn out in Egypt. Their mistake was overestimating the significance of the democratic secularists, how representative the anti-Mubarak demonstrators were of Egypt as a whole, and the degree to which those demonstrators were committed to Western-style democracy rather than a democracy that represented Islamist values. 

1
George Friedman

George Friedman

George Friedman is the CEO and chief intelligence officer of Stratfor, a private intelligence company located in Austin, TX.

Most Recent Articles

Join the Debate
8 Comments So Far
iosjdfdjkfi Wrote: Jun 03, 2012 9:40 PM
More characteristics, novel style,varieties,and good quality low price
http://iol.io/ap7zm

More characteristics, novel style,varieties,and good quality low price
http://iol.io/ap7zm

More characteristics, novel style,varieties,and good quality low price
http://iol.io/ap7zm
Blair31 Wrote: Jun 03, 2012 9:31 PM
I hope the Islamist loses.
TDBLU Wrote: Jun 03, 2012 12:17 PM
Islamists are persons afraid to leave the, "Daddy, Mommy, I'm afraid of the dark" mentality that is the foundation of all ancient superstitions,more than even Catholics are. The only reason that it is Isam threatening to blast us all into the dark ages,(again), is that unlike western cultures, the Islamist adherent allows no, none, zero, zilch,(getting the idea?) of the classic,"separation of church and state" that we've attempted to maintain here. Islam has already made the first attacks on us. We are already fiddling while Rome burns. Your favorite flavors of Escapism and Denial will not keep you from the flames.
Undo4me Wrote: Jun 03, 2012 11:04 AM
Speak for yourself. Journalists and liberals may have deluded themselves into these foolish ideas but anyone paying attention to history (reality version, not liberal propaganda) knows that since the rise of Mohammed Jerusalem has only been controlled by anyone other than an Islamist empire for 88 years before 1947. Only a fool, a journalist or a delusional liberal would think that we are witnessing anything other than a recovery of the Muslim caliphate and a restoration of the Caliphate's international Imperialist expansion. Next year we celebrate the 100th anniversary of the Muslim instigated World War, how can you forget? They don't.
doc, aka Rich Wrote: Jun 03, 2012 1:35 PM
Not sure if correct. 88 is the interval from 1099 to 1187. However, Byzantine Jerusalem was not conquered until 634 (after Muhammad's death).
Dave262 Wrote: Jun 03, 2012 8:00 AM
The U.S. is always a sucker for oppressed people and we continue to make the mistake of thinking that they will be like us if only given the chance. The best that we can do is to stay vigalent for another Hitler in the making such as Sadam was then deal with it. Past that we should just sit back and watch and only give aid in a disaster.
Kepha Wrote: Jun 03, 2012 10:25 AM
John Quincy Adams said that the US shouldn't go abroad to look for dragons to slay, and should be the well-wisher of liberty for all but champion only of its own. It was sound advice then, and is sound advice now.
Joe 145 Wrote: May 30, 2012 9:34 AM
Good article. Thanks for the work.

I would like to add that your mention of Turkey and its balance between military and Islamic influence is crucial. And typical of the region.
(Exception: Israel)