There's one huge risk in investing on the short side of a heavily-shorted stock. If short sellers are forced to cover their positions by buying back borrowed shares, then they unwittingly help spur a buying frenzy, pushing a stock up quickly. With the market steadily rebounding, that's precisely what's been happening, as the shorts' favorite targets are some of the biggest gainers of 2012.
 
Paradoxically, that makes this a great time initiate a fresh short position in these very same stocks. Short sellers already pointed the way to problematic business models, and at higher prices than when they were initially targeted, they could easily be even more overvalued now.
 
Short sellers are likely to retarget these names when they are done licking their bloody paws, but you have a chance to go short in these stocks before them.
 
Even if you don't tend to be a short seller, the short squeeze should at least compel you to take profits if you are hold these stocks in a long position. They've been pushed up by exogenous factors and are likely to fall back once the current rally peters out.
 
The stocks below have all risen at least 30% in just the first seven weeks of 2011...
http://cdn.streetauthority.info:81/images/02-21-12-ds1.png
 
Unwarranted rising confidence in BofA
The sharp rebound in&
1
David Sterman

David Sterman

David Sterman has worked as an investment analyst for nearly two decades. He is currently an analyst for StreetAuthority.com

Most Recent Articles

Join the Debate
14 Comments So Far
Blair31 Wrote: Feb 23, 2012 6:07 PM
Flagged as spam. Somewhere, a village is missing its idiot.
The_Sloandog Wrote: Feb 23, 2012 9:17 AM
Republican small government in action.

"Under the new legislation, women who want an abortion will be forcibly penetrated for no medical reason."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-politics/9096749/Virginia-law-would-force-women-seeking-abortion-to-undergo-probe.html

I am not the first person to note that under any other set of facts, that would constitute rape under the federal definition.*

What’s more, a provision of the law that has received almost no media attention would ensure that a certification by the doctor that the patient either did or didn’t “avail herself of the opportunity” to view the ultrasound or listen to the fetal heartbeat will go into the woman’s medical record.
Barskor Wrote: Feb 23, 2012 9:04 AM
Support Ron Paul Go to AmericansElect.org and vote for him too be the choice for the Third party run For the Presidency 2012! AmericansElect.org will do all the paper work needed in all 50 states and Ron Paul can just step in and Be our Hero!
Ron Paul No matter what 2012!
Doug4749 Wrote: Feb 23, 2012 10:52 AM
Yeah, go Ron Paul. I fully support him as a third-party candidate. He'll suck off only about 15 votes because that's all the support he has. And, if The Donald decides to run, he'd have to run as a fourth-party candidate. Both of them can't do the kind of damage Ross did, so I say, let 'em run! It'[ll be fun watching them make (even greater) fools of themselves.
Blair31 Wrote: Feb 23, 2012 6:05 PM
Ron Paul would be our Neville Chamberlain. I could just imagine him coming to the microphones in the
White House Press Room and saying to the Lamestream Media: "We now have peace in our time."
The Khaliafat Program was a 1920s attempt to force the Allies to retain the Ottoman Caliphate. It started in British India and spread to the Arab World. It failed. The Muslim Brotherhood, and the Salafists, who control the Egyptian Parliament, and the Islamists who control the governments of Morocco, Libya, and Tunisia, want a Caliphate.
jojojojojojo Wrote: Feb 23, 2012 9:00 AM
http://www.iloveushopping.com Cheapest Air Max Shoes,Tiffany Jewelry Company,Wholesale AF Clothing

Online Store:

Cheapest Vans Shoes $37

Fashion Tiffany Bangles $20

Wholesale Hollister Tshirt $18

jordan shoes $38

nike shox $37

Christan Audigier bikini $18

Ed Hardy Bikini $18

Sinful short_t-shirt_woman $16

http://www.iloveushopping.com
iooujhjjkglhjgh Wrote: Feb 23, 2012 8:00 AM
Wonderful.

Share a website with you ,

http://mcaf.ee/5zn47/

Believe you will love it.


we are accept credit card free shipping
Drik Wrote: Feb 22, 2012 6:59 PM
I would probably make the most money by finding out which companies belong to a millionaire or billionaire democratic donor who has received Obamamoney to keep afloat.
And selling those short.

http://delendam.wordpress.com
None1257 Wrote: Feb 22, 2012 1:10 PM
"If" your goal is to have a whole lot more money at the end, what is the best way to achieve that goal?
raelonda0903 Wrote: Feb 22, 2012 12:03 PM
In 2003, Iraq was a minority Sunni-led nation, and there was little likelihood Iran would move WMD through Iraq to Lebanon or Palestine, because Iran was and is a Shiite theocracy. These countries were enemies.

We helped install a Shiite-majority government in Iraq. This government will get closer to Iran. Iraq will become a transporting ground for WMD into countries surrounding Israel.

The Iraq war didn't make the Middle East safer. It made it more dangerous. Saddam was a paper tiger in 2003. And a lot of brave Americans paid an incredible price for "victory." But we didn't make the politics there any more favorable to our overall needs.