A few years ago, I shared a satirical divorce decree that would allow conservatives and liberals to amicably separate into two different countries.
This seemed like a good idea, particularly since another piece of satire suggested that Canada was being overrun by statists who were upset by the Tea Party election of 2010.
And don’t forget that I wrote a serious column in 2012 speculating whether advocates of limited government should be the ones moving north instead.
But rather than divorce or mass emigration, what if we could resolve our differences and live together in peace and tranquility?
Y’all may be thinking I’m smoking some of that stuff that libertarians want to legalize, but I want to make a serious point.
Or, to be more specific, I want to test whether our statist friends are serious.
I’m motivated by this presumably legitimate Facebook message. It’s designed, I’m guessing, to poke fun at conservatives who utilize government while simultaneously complaining about government.
Having read this diatribe, I want to make two points, and then end with a proposal.
My first point is that many of the supposed benefits of government would exist even if the public sector disappeared tomorrow.
There are some government-owned utilities, but I think we all recognize that most electricity is generated by the private sector.
Private satellite companies and private news companies would provide weather forecasts in the absence of NOAA and NASA.
Private food companies and private drug companies would have big incentives to provide safe products in the absence of government inspections.
In Other News: Can We Ask Al Qaeda for a Refund on the Bowe Bergdahl Prisoner Swap? | Michael Schaus