I spoke at the United Nations back in May, explaining that more government was the wrong way to help the global economy.

But I guess I’m not very persuasive. The bureaucrats have just released a new report entitled, “In Search of New Development Finance.”

As you can probably guess, what they’re really searching for is more money for global redistribution.

But here’s the most worrisome part of their proposal. They want the U.N. to be in charge of collecting the taxes, sort of a permanent international bureaucracy entitlement.

I’ve written before about the U.N.’s desire for tax authority (on more than one occasion), but this new report is noteworthy for the size and scope of taxes that have been proposed.

Here’s the wish list of potential global taxes, pulled from page vi of the preface.

Here’s some of what the report had to say about a few of the various tax options. We’ll start with the carbon tax, which I recently explained was a bad idea if imposed inside the U.S. by politicians in Washington. It’s a horrible idea if imposed globally by the kleptocrats at the United Nations.

…a tax of $25 per ton of CO2 emitted by developed countries is expected to raise $250 billion per year in global tax revenues. Such a tax would be in addition to taxes already imposed at the national level, as many Governments (of developing as well as developed countries) already tax carbon emissions, in some cases explicitly, and in other cases, indirectly through taxes on specific fuels.

1
Daniel J. Mitchell

Daniel J. Mitchell

Daniel J. Mitchell is a top expert on tax reform and supply-side tax policy at the Cato Institute.

Be the first to read Daniel J. Mitchell’s column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Most Recent Articles

Join the Debate
57 Comments So Far
« Previous12Next »
Kevin201 Wrote: Oct 02, 2012 12:50 AM
That such a tax would be unfairly collected and corruptly distributed is beside the point. That it would retard economic growth and be counter-productive for developing nations is beside the point. The power to lay and collect taxes is a governmental power. The U.N. is not a government, but an international meeting place for dispute resolution. It relies on the cooperation of its members and - obviously - has no power to compel participation, much less obedience. Only the foolish naivete or narcissism of 68 Americans (prez + 2/3 of Senate) can compel all the rest us to comply. They must not be permitted to consider it.
SpaceVegetable Wrote: Oct 01, 2012 8:48 PM
What is this obsession the leftists have with taxing financial transactions? They seem mired in the 20th century. With the enormous expansion of the internet and the increase in digital services, banking and investment transactions are no longer the province of the wealthy. Just about anyone can trade equities, bonds, currencies, commodities... and anything else they choose to trade with little effort or expense. Yet these doofuses seem to think that only the wealthy do any of this. What rock are they living under?
dtaylor944 Wrote: Oct 01, 2012 10:40 AM
Just what a strugling America needs, another tax that we get nothing for. Why are we so deeply ignorant? We are losing our homes and everythiing else due to the economic debacle and we send money to countries that attack us and we fund countries through fuel and oil purchases that want us dead and will use our own money to wipe us off the face of the earth. I am on early social security because I wouldn't hire an attorney to represent me for disability. I tried my best last year to keep making my own way and now I owe $5616.00 back. I was shopping at the grocery one evening and I received a call on my cell saying I had a commercial vehicle parked in a handicap parking place. I had the proper placement of the handicap plaque but .
aebe Wrote: Oct 01, 2012 12:35 AM
And the UNelephant tries backing through the door,again.
If the UN were not corrupt,it would be a bad idea,giving up sovereignity by allowing such creatures to tax citizens,not of the world,but of real countries.
The UN cannot get all it's members to pay their dues,and it wants more.To give it anything,would not take away the want.And once the muslim or socialist nations found they could vote themselves free money,they will have impoverished the world in short order.
Just the tax on money transactions was supposed to be able to save the world,all by itself.And how many taxes does the UN have in mind ? More.Many more.
the UN is long past any time that it might have served a useful purpose,time now for it to go away.

aebe Wrote: Oct 01, 2012 12:36 AM

Validate your 2nd Amendment Rights.Carry.
dtaylor944 Wrote: Oct 01, 2012 10:50 AM
Amen! Carry large we will need it. Why did the white house say it was a spontaneous attack due to a film? Because he wants to blame it on our own right to free speech and not on his fellow Muslim brotherhood. Wake up america before it is to late.
dtaylor944 Wrote: Oct 01, 2012 10:46 AM
Dump the UN. The only good thing that has come out of the last meeting is that the camera man that was with the Iranian dictator has stayed in the US and is asking for asylum in the US. On the other hand now we have one more of them in the United States that we probably shpuld not trust.
THE MAIN PROBLEM I HAVE NOTICED IS THAT PEOPLE WILL VOTE FOR obama BECAUSE THEY ARE DEMOCRATS. THEY NEED TO TAKE A LONG LOOK AT WHAT A DEMOCRAT IS DEFINED TO BE AND WHAT WE HAVE AS PRESIDENT.
Incredulous2 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 11:48 PM
aebe Wrote: Oct 01, 2012 12:37 AM
Toasters were wednesday.
Scott853 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 6:33 PM
Though I still consider any talk of global taxes as conspiracy theorist black helicopter kookie talk, I am sure you would have found many people in government in the 1850s that thought Marx and Engels had nutsy ideas that no one would be stupid enough to try.
jhartzog805 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 5:05 PM
IT IS SIMPLY A WAY FOR THE UN TO GET FUNDS TO PUSH AGENDA 21 FOR A ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT ALL CENTERED AROUND THEM. THEY ARE NOT FOR PEACE AS WE ARE TOLD AS WHY BE IN AFGHANISTAN YET NOT IN SYRIA, EGYPT AND OTHER COUNTRIES PERSECUTING THEIR OWN CITIZENS. THE RICHEST OF THE RICH LIKE ROAKAFELLOWS AND GEORGE SOROS BACK THE UN WITH MONEY AS THEY ARE A PART OF THE PLAN AS THEY WILL BE THE BANKING FOR THE WORLD IF THEY HAVE THEIR WAY. WE NEED TO GET OUT OF THE UN PERIOD AND KICK THEM OUT OF NY AS WELL. ANYONE WHOM WOULD LET A LEADER OF A COUNTRY AS IRAN COME AND SPEAK OPENLY ABOUT COMMITTING GENOCIDE AGAINST ISRAEL AND SCHEDULE THE SPEECH ON YAP-KIPPUR TO BOOT IS NO MAKER OF PEACE.
Blair31 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 4:38 PM
Sounds good in theory but it won't work in practice.
Wumingren Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 3:15 PM
Depending upon who you want to believe, there are 196 countries in the world today. How is it that the U.N. has selected only 43 to pay the tobacco tax? Before we even get started, we have an unfair tax scheme! Did the U.N. select only the countries that have market measures adequate enough to take a snap-shot of their economies? Did the U.N. exclude those countries that are already black-marketing tobacco products, which would have no mechanisms for collecting the tax? Let us not forget that Americans declared war on their own patron, England, for screwing up taxation and representation. The U.N. represents no one! It is merely a conference hall, not a government.
Wumingren Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 3:15 PM
To give this entity a sovereign right to levy taxes is to diminish the sovereignty of every nation that succumbs to its manipulations. If they bring world taxes upon us, I predict there will be a smoking black hole at coordinates 40º44'58"N 73º58'5"W. That's 760 United States Plaza, New York, New York 10017.
SpaceVegetable Wrote: Oct 01, 2012 8:58 PM
Exactly! Once you agree to taxes, then they'll want the authority to collect them. They'll erode freedom and sovereignty a little at a time, until they have complete control. Frogs in a kettle, my friends.
SpaceVegetable Wrote: Oct 01, 2012 8:58 PM
Exactly! Once you agree to taxes, then they'll want the authority to collect them. They'll erode freedom and sovereignty a little at a time, until they have complete control. Frogs in a kettle, my friends.
Curtis104 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 2:12 PM
Didn't we have a revolution in the 1700's over taxes?? I swear that the founding fathers of this country would be rolling over in their graves if they knew how we are taxed today! I understand the need for taxes. They help to build infrastructure and pay for vital services we all need. But, come on some of these taxes; they must pay lawyers hundreds of thousands of dollars to make up new names, or to create new taxes for them to implement. Call this one the "just because." tax, Just because I want to tax you tax! When will it be enough already!
Curtis104 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 2:15 PM
The UN is just as impotent and powerless as the League of Nations before it. If the U.S. would get smart ant pull out, it would be nothing!
Snarkasterous1 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 1:31 PM
One truly must admire the UN's latest push. Clearly, that feckless organization is seeking to add "fiscal incontinence" to its current list of "achievements," including:

"Providing an international stage for despots, dictators, and lunatics"
"Endlessly 'denouncing,' over and over, those acts committed by the despots, dictators, and lunatics cited above"

American taxpayers, though, can take comfort in the fact that we merely house and fund 25% of this pathetic international circus.

- Snark
Old Lady2 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 1:06 PM
This is a part of The UN's agenda 21. Have you had a New Condo built in your downtown area. 2 stories with retail stores on the lower level, check it out, it may be part of the agenda 21. This tax is part of their gobal initative. There are many sites with info on it.
dtaylor944 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 12:27 PM
Haven't we had this type taxation before and it ende3d in some type of party. Oh yes teaparty. Taxation without representation.Withe the american worker in as much trouble as he is now let's add another tax that goes to other countries. Did Obama come up with this on his own or did he have help??
None1257 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 11:50 AM
Once someone figures out how to collect taxes, does that mean in the future they will be satisfied with how much they collect, or will they want even more?
dtaylor944 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 12:29 PM
Now I am sure you know the answer to that one .History repeats itself.
jvance Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 11:14 AM
The UN is totally usless, full of radicals, LOL give them taxing athority, of course Obozo would be all for it.
we really need to close these Pigs down, kick them out of USA.!!!
dtaylor944 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 12:31 PM
you da m sure have nmy vote. The longer we wait the longer it will take and we have been moving in the wrong direction.
Larue4 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 10:56 AM
The UN is a bubble in a sea of humanity, repesenting no one, edifyig no one but hungry for your dollars, or any other currency that has strong underpinnings. Thanks Mr. Mitchel for keeping us infomed of the shenanigans at he UN.
gwharpo Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 10:14 AM
I see dead people. ALL of them politicians and their support mechanisms.
Jay Wye Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 10:21 AM
yes,it's time to feed the hogs.
dtaylor944 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 12:33 PM
Amen, how do we get so many people to show up to vote and wind up like we are. Chek that vote count come election day.
FletchforFreedom Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 6:45 PM
You must be readig the Dem voter rolls...
Rick 2811 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 9:52 AM
The UN should probably direct its operation to redistribute money in the world, because what they are doing now to keep peace sure isn't a success. On the other hand, what would give anyone, anywhere the notion that they'd be successful handing out money? Though it might given them a new lease on life. Some additional funds for them to dole out and some, probably a majority, to keep in their coffers for important trips, conventions, seminars and better pay !!
Wanda110 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 9:37 AM
We continually send out dollars overseas, the hands are always out for money from the US. Yet, the UN doesn't count that as redistribution or a tax that we already pay. No more of that nonsense. The USA has been paying more than their fair share of "global tax" for decades.
modernmover Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 9:22 AM
Here's one they haven't thought of. A GRAVITY TAX. Those using too much gravity (obese) will pay a higher tax than those that use less gravity. Just like labeling C02 a pollutant, this will make every person a violator, so anyone can be prosecuted at any time. The government gets to pick and choose whom to prosecute. If global warming is such a threat to the world, just think what would happen if we were to use up all the gravity. All skinny people would float off into space
johnm h Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 9:15 AM
One can understand the post war euphoria about the UN after the Allies defeated Nazi Germany, the belief in the power of foreign aid after the Marshall plan, the urge to shore up countries threatened by communism but we now have 60 years to demonstrate that foreign aid in general makes things worse, that the UN is primarily a cabal of dysfunctional mini states staffed through patronage and paid for by the west. It is time, not to give them sources of revenue, but to move it out of the US. The WHO is the only specialized agency that serves a purpose. The rest is pork for connected folks and a stage for clowns.
dtaylor944 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 12:39 PM
We the people can't seem to get together enough to accomplish anything other than the mess we are left with after all the crooked politicians acted foolishly for years. I am talking about both parties but as I have said obama has put stupidity on steroids.
Tom1000 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 9:09 AM
What choice do we have? Easy. Get out of the UN. It's a crock anyway. It's the "Better Business Bureau" of the world . . . letting "members" off the hook. Except the Jooos, of course. And the US, since we're stinkin' rich.
dtaylor944 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 12:40 PM
Some ofus stink less than others.
true liberal Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 8:24 AM
When will the people put in Congressmen that understand that the UN was meant to discuss issues amongst nations and not be another wealth redistribution mechanism.

We ought to get in on the racket and charge each member a $100 mil/yr to the US for hosting the UN.
Lars795 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 8:54 AM
Now that "tax" I could go with, of course you'll have arguments from the member nations of the UN saying it's not fair.
peggy149 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 8:21 AM
ALL THIS IS, IS A PONZIE SCHEME, NOTHING MORE NOTHING LESS, IF WE DON'T DROP KICK THIS UN INTO THE NEXT WORLD, IT WILL BE OUR DOWN FALL, THIS WILL MAKE THE DICTATORS OF THE WORLD'S POCKETS BULGE, BUT THE RICHER AND BIGGER THEY ARE THE HARDER THEY FALL, AND THEY ALL DO IN TIME.
zim3 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 8:18 AM
It is time to PUSH the U.N out of NYC and America needs t o pull out of membership of that socialist/communist outfit it is a nest of snakes ,,,
dtaylor944 Wrote: Sep 30, 2012 12:43 PM
It won't happen as long as king obama is in power. We are in danger, yes grave danger. How did a free society get like this???
« Previous12Next »