I confess to being monotonous and repetitive when it comes to explaining that America’s fiscal problem is too much spending, and that debt and deficits are simply symptoms of that underlying problem of excessive government.

But no matter how often I repeat myself, the message isn’t sinking in – even among people who should know better.

That’s why I’ve created the “Bob Dole Award.” I’m hoping that a bit of well-intentioned moral suasion may convince people (at least the ones who presumably are on the right side) to be a bit more careful with their rhetoric.

The first winner of this (hopefully uncoveted) award are the Republicans of the House Ways & Means Committee.

These are the GOPers with the most influence over both tax and entitlement policy, so it’s very important that they understand the real problem and properly communicate with the outside world.

Unfortunately, even though the Committee normally produces good material, they messed up last week when sending out information about Obama’s big-spending budget proposal.

They issued a press release entitled “More than twice the debt in half the time,” and the document (also pasted to the right) accurately shows how red ink has exploded during the Obama years.

But a statist organization, left-wing lobby, or some other pro-big government entity could put out exactly the same press release and make it part of an argument for higher taxes.

1
Daniel J. Mitchell

Daniel J. Mitchell

Daniel J. Mitchell is a top expert on tax reform and supply-side tax policy at the Cato Institute.

Be the first to read Daniel J. Mitchell’s column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Most Recent Articles

Join the Debate
21 Comments So Far
fufufufufufu Wrote: Feb 22, 2012 12:17 AM
http://www.iloveushopping.com Cheapest Air Max Shoes,Tiffany Jewelry Company,Wholesale AF Clothing

Online Store:

Cheapest Vans Shoes $37

Fashion Tiffany Bangles $20

Wholesale Hollister Tshirt $18

jordan shoes $38

nike shox $37

Christan Audigier bikini $18

Ed Hardy Bikini $18

Sinful short_t-shirt_woman $16

http://www.iloveushopping.com



canetoad Wrote: Feb 21, 2012 6:32 PM
Explain to me how cutting expenditures on government services such as infrastructure, state aid, investment in jobs, unemployment insurance and the payroll tax while handing out tax cuts to the wealthy will boost the economy. The perverse irony of austerity cuts is that it drives down demand and GDP thus driving down revenues and deepening the deficit hole. All those wealthy job creators need demand to create jobs otherwise they will just sit on their tax cuts.
Blair31 Wrote: Feb 21, 2012 7:13 PM
First of all, the government's broke. It's been broke since the '70s. Second of all, the tax cuts are for EVERYBODY! NOT JUST THE WEALTHY. Lincoln said that "You can't raise up the wage-earner by bringing down the wage-payer." Something the fleabaggers of OWS don't understand.
DavidM Wrote: Feb 21, 2012 10:08 PM
Explain to me how allowing job-creators to keep their own money is "handing it out".

ALso explain to me how we were all starving in the streets in 2007, because that is where the federal level of spending should be.
kenneth416 Wrote: Feb 21, 2012 10:50 AM
Not fair to blame Rep. Camp and his colleagues on the Ways and Means Committee. They are not the leadership--that distinction belongs to Speaker Boehner and Majority Leader Cantor. If the Republicans REALLY wanted to reduce the national debt (note that I did not say reduce the deficit), they would address the problem as would any business or head of household. That is, they would lay out the planned expenditures and the estimated revenues, side by side, and make a decision on what to cut and by how much, or the dreaded option of increasing revenues (i.e., taxes on the people) They will not do it, though, because they would likely be UN-ELECTED the next time elections come.
Pamela166 Wrote: Feb 21, 2012 2:14 PM
AMEN; Excellent thoughts and reasoning.
Blair31 Wrote: Feb 21, 2012 10:36 AM
We have to get rid of those in Congress who think that if we spend more we'll get out of debt. Really?
I don't think so.
Pamela166 Wrote: Feb 21, 2012 2:16 PM
A liberal troll spouting nonsense SPAM from its nether regions where its cranium has been firmly inserted for far too many years destroying any brain tissue, thus ending any pretense of intelligence it may have had in its very early years when it was still getting poopy diapers changed.

If you have too much personal debt, you go out and spend more is that right?/ _smacks forehead with palm of hand.
1ConservativeUSA Wrote: Feb 21, 2012 9:16 AM
I've continued to say and write that profligate government spending is our primary problem, followd closely by overreaching government regulation and intrusion into the private sector.

Any other argument, like "taxing the rich", "payroll tax holidays" or "stimulus" are mere distractions.
MoreFreedom Wrote: Feb 21, 2012 8:20 AM
Why won't some Republican say that rather than employers be forced to pay for unemployment insurance, that employees choose whether they will buy it out of their own pay or not? And that we don't need government subsidizing it.