"I've cut taxes for those who need it: middle-class, families, small businesses" - President Obama Tweet
 
"@Barackobama we also need to cut them for those listed on Forbes as 'millionaires' if they are not, you must consider that as well." -Lindsay Lohan Tweet
 
Beyond the fact the Lindsay Lohan did more harm to her Hollywood career with that single tweet than any drug addiction, impulse to shoplift or reputation for showing up late for filming ever could, she hit on an important point. The proposed tax hike on families earning more than $250,000 is destructive and unfair. It's unfair to label these households "rich" and to hint they somehow got all the breaks and are taking advantage of poor people.  Yet, this is exactly what President Obama is doing and without a trace of contrition. 
 


See more top stories from Townhall Finance. New Homepage, more content. Be the best informed fiscal conservative.

Calling someone a millionaire that clearly isn't a millionaire is wrong on so many levels, but these days the speech has been altered to calling these households "billionaires" and in the heat of the moment -usually on a college campus where romanticism rules – you will hear these people described as "trillionaires." Small businesses that are producing jobs would be crushed by higher taxes. The fact is, most businesses aren't using tax breaks offered by the administration, which is fine with me, as I prefer they hire people than buy a new copy machine for accelerated tax write offs. 
 
Liberals are having a field day with the Lohan tweet because shooting the messenger is easier than shooting fish in a barrel and the message gets taken down in the process.  I think my
1
Charles Payne

Charles Payne

Charles V. Payne is a regular contributor to the Fox Business and Fox News Networks. He is also the Chief Executive Officer and Principle Analyst of Wall Street Strategies, Inc. (WSSI), founded in 1991 which provides subscription analytical services to both individual and institutional investors.

Most Recent Articles

Join the Debate
17 Comments So Far
theabnranger Wrote: Sep 15, 2012 7:47 PM
Well, that oughta work . . . . . Baracko Bama and Lindsay Lohan have the same underwhelming sense and competence about economics.
Kibitzer Wrote: Sep 12, 2012 11:30 PM
He is calling the game from Saul Alinsky's playbook.
Blair31 Wrote: Sep 12, 2012 6:33 PM
He won't do it. He wants the European model.
Bill61 Wrote: Sep 12, 2012 12:05 PM
Charles: You are my guy on 'Varney & Co.'. Being a former law enforcement officer in 'The Land of Fruits & Nuts' (California), we had a statute in the Welfare and Institutions Code, Section 5150, that gave us the power to commit a person that was, in our estimation, delusional, or a danger to him/herself or others to a 48 hour observation in a certified mental health facility. Ms. Lohan fits that description, IMHO. -- Yer pal, Ferrari Bubba
Jeff_Georgia Wrote: Sep 12, 2012 1:50 PM
The president of the United States of America fits that description, B6.
Magna Wrote: Sep 12, 2012 11:09 AM
All of humpidys richest can not fund this country -with the extra monies it would generate -but it sure sounds GOOD does it not when you are playing the class warfare card for minion heads -once again the extra money would only fund this country for TWO weeks -that is all people -we need more than that to fuel this engine -
did you happen to see or hear about Bob Woodard's book on what recently happened here at the treasury when it nearly ran out of money we had only 5 Billion Dollars left in the National Treasury -we were almost broke folks -there is a mad man at the helm of this ship -this is a fact of what happened --that is like you having 1 cent in your account or less.
RHSimard Wrote: Sep 12, 2012 3:12 PM
Yes, but it sells well to too many of our population with essentially zero understanding of even the rudiments of economics and business and how capital works. Here's that hilarious and yet dismaying video of Peter Schiff finding out how many delegates to the Dems' convention would love a law banning all corporate profits outright.
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2012/09/06/dems_we_totally_support_banning_corporate_profits
vietnamvet Wrote: Sep 12, 2012 11:07 AM
Watch "2012 Obama's America"
He is not really going to take from the rich and give the the 'American poor'.
His ultimate plan, as a anti-colonialist, is to send all of the wealth, prestige, and power of the United States to Bangeladesh, Pakistan, Somalia, and all of the other countries which are 'poor' because of having been raped by western colonial empires.

It's a mission that came to him when he adopted that dream from his father.
As limited as Obama is in most areas, it's sad but unsurprising that he couldn't even come with his own dreams ...
calhar Wrote: Sep 12, 2012 12:47 PM
If I know my History the U.S hasn't Colonialized no country except maybe from war.All of the Colonialist came from Europe.If Obama considers this country a colonialist country then he has his marbles mixed up.This country has saved the world from disaster twice and we owe no one nothing not even an apology.The fuzzy thinking of this guy is that of an Idiot.The slave market of the past was was born and used by these same "Europeans"who were the colonialist that emigrated here.Those people are in our "PAST HISTORY"It's only in the books.It's time to move on.These so called poor countries are so corrupt they will never change.Obamas dream of his father will turn into a hightmare.All I can say is get a life OBAMA.
essie2 Wrote: Sep 12, 2012 2:33 PM
Oh, but Cal! Youuuuu don't understaaaaand. The British colonized everywhere, to the point that it was said "The sun never sets on the British Empire"; the US replaced Great Britain as a world power, therefore, the US is responsible for Great Britain's colonizations. (Besides, all those white people look alike. British, French, American, whatever. They ALL did/do it.)
RHSimard Wrote: Sep 12, 2012 2:45 PM
Ooh, I've got to pass this on, even though it's a bit off topic. True story.

Somewhere, a class of elementary-school students was to answer or explain various things, on of which was that famous saying that the sun never sets on the British Empire. This tyke may have been rather off the mark, but he or she gets high marks for imagination:

Q: What does this mean: "The sun never sets on the British Empire?"
A: Britain is in the east, and the sun sets in the west.
William Gensert Wrote: Sep 12, 2012 7:32 AM
That's the problem with the "rich." Not only are there not enough of them to tax the nation into prosperity, the definition of "rich" will continually be expanded to include eventually almost everyone.

http://www.americanthinker.com/william_l_gensert/
uhohshortsonthehighway Wrote: Sep 12, 2012 7:26 AM
Clearly B. Hussen does not understand, or refuses to understand just how people are employed by the wealthy. His view seems to be of a bunch of Scrooge McDucks, miserly people swimming in piles of cash and laughing at the poor. To tax these people more heavily just invites layoffs, shutdowns, and more production moved overseas. I think B. Hussein's view comes from a lifetime of liberal drivel being poured into his ears from his mother, his grandparents, and friends like the Ayers.
Don664 Wrote: Sep 12, 2012 10:46 AM
The assumption that Obama is stupid or incompetent must be put to rest. He's doing exactly what he set out to do. And he's succeeding. And Romney is going to lose the election unless he goes on the offensive. He has the facts. He needs to stop being nice about it.
calhar Wrote: Sep 12, 2012 1:14 PM
Don just what has he set out to do??????????Hope and change just doesn't quite cut it.Even if Romney wins you won't see much change.Government only gets in a lot of peoples hair.This country runs on capitalism not Idiology.WE have what is called continuity of Government,so it just goes on.Even our two party system is only a Bureaucracy.Take a good hard look at it.! ! ! !
RHSimard Wrote: Sep 12, 2012 2:41 PM
The bulk of the Left has that same Scrooge McDuck fairy-tale perception. Those childhood tales intended to teach an essential lesson on kindness and selflessness by contrasting a rich and avaricious baron in a castle exploiting and oppressing the decent poor he enslaves might serve to get that simple moral lesson across, but these people seem never to have updated their stereotypes to an adult view of the real world. They needed a clear, dispassionate education on the essentials of business in a capitalist society to equip them to judge it without emotion-driven fantasies.
Greg1084 Wrote: Sep 12, 2012 7:15 AM
That second to last paragraph is a perfect description of your typical dem. A thug watching an ATM with a brick in his hand.