Less than a year ago, amid the commodities and credit
market collapse, some investors were seriously stressing
about the solvency of
Chesapeake Energy (NYSE: CHK). The stock
briefly dipped below $10 on massive volumes in early
December, which prompted management to hold a conference call
to reassure investors that the company wasn't crumbling.
Following that call, I decided that a
five-bagger(i.e., a fivefold rise in the share price) was
more likely than a Chesapeake bankruptcy. So far, so good --
the shares closed the day of the shareholder update at
$13.86, so the stock has only about another 140% to go.
2009 turned out fine
Following the late 2008 crisis of confidence, we saw
Chesapeake stop worrying and
learn to lovelow gas prices,
chuckmore production, and keep growth
in check. That was the first half of 2009. More recently,
Chesapeake has stopped holding back, for reasons outlined
here.
No matter what happens to natural gas prices from here to
the end of the year, 2009 is really a closed book, thanks to
Chesapeake's hedges. The company will generate around $3.7
billion in operating cash flow, whether gas prices remain
weak, or double next week. It's 2010 and beyond that
investors need to concern themselves with today.
Having held its annual analyst day last week, the company
has given us plenty to chew on. With nearly 200 slides in the
deck, the mega-presentation might strike you as overwhelming,
but I'll try and tease out a few key themes.
It's all about the Big Four (plus one)
All year, Chesapeake has been building up its theme of
the "shale haves" versus the "shale have-nots." The company
argues that a big bifurcation in the industry cost curve is
coming, with rock-bottom finding costs accruing to the former
group for decades to come. Meanwhile, costs for the have-nots
will not only remain high, but rise as these players drill
increased density (or "infill") and rate acceleration wells
in existing fields rather than new discoveries.
Chesapeake is the No. 1 player in this country's two
largest "Big Four" shale plays -- the Haynesville and the
Marcellus. The company trails only
Southwestern Energy (NYSE: SWN) in the
Fayetteville, and is
second to
Devon Energy (NYSE: DVN) in the Barnett. You
might accuse Chesapeake of "talking its book" here, but keep
in mind that the company has an extensive background in, and
continuing significant exposure to, conventional natural gas
plays. Chesapeake's nonshale, nonwash rig count has dropped
from 74 rigs to just seven. That's dictated by economics, not
a pet theory. Also consider that even the few
low-costnonshale players like
Ultra Petroleum (NYSE: UPL) are making
serious moves on plays like the Marcellus.
Beyond the shale
What's this wash business? That's the "plus one"
alluded to above. Shale rock doesn't have an exclusive grip
on the low end of the cost curve. By drilling horizontally
into various granite wash formations in the midcontinent
area, Chesapeake has unlocked some hugely profitable
plays.
In the Colony Granite Wash, for example, the company
estimates a per-well present value, discounted at 10%, of
about $11 million, compared to a drill and complete cost of
just $6.25 million. Chesapeake is understandably very active
in what it's dubbed the Greater Granite Wash play, with
Cimarex Energy (NYSE: XEC) rating a distant
second in terms of horizontal wells drilled. Continued... |