No one's more upset about last year's corporate meltdown
than investors. Yet investors aren't blameless for the moves
that ended up costing them money during the bear market.
The folks at ShareOwners.org recently released some
interesting survey results, finding that a third of Americans
(34%) are "angry" about Wall Street's role in our recent
financial meltdown. Some 79% want to see "strong action" to
remedy problems.
Interestingly, 87% of those surveyed agreed that
"investors who lose their retirement savings due to fraud and
abuse should have the right to go to court if necessary to
recover those funds." It's hard for me to argue with that,
but I hope that the respondents realize that most people who
lost lots of money in 2008 didn't do so because of fraud.
For example, check out the 2008 performance from some
companies that reside on
Fortunemagazine's list of most-admired companies,
along with their ratings on
Motley Fool CAPS:
Company
CAPS Rating
(out of five)
2008 return
Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL)
***
(57%)
Google (Nasdaq: GOOG)
***
(56%)
Starbucks (Nasdaq: SBUX)
**
(54%)
Best Buy (NYSE: BBY)
**
(46%)
Intel (Nasdaq: INTC)
****
(43%)
Cisco Systems (Nasdaq: CSCO)
****
(40%)
Toyota Motor (NYSE: TM)
***
(36%)
Southwest Airlines
***
(29%)
Data: Motley Fool CAPS,
Morningstar.
It's very often the case that when there's a big
disruption in the market,
moststocks suffer, at least for a while. It's true
that massive misbehavior and lax supervision led many
companies to a bad end and took many other companies with
them -- but for most, it wasn't simple fraud.
You might argue that fraud or other malfeasance at some
companies led to the marketwide meltdown of 2008 and was thus
responsible for it all. But think a little harder: What
really sank otherwise healthy stocks was, to a large extent,
the fact that investors lost faith, panicked, and sold their
shares. In other words,
weare to blame, to some degree, if we sold holdings
out of fear.
Did investors really think that Starbucks, Best Buy, and
Toyota were going to go out of business? I doubt it. What
those companies have in common, though, is simply some
cyclicality. When the economy sours, many investors are less
eager to buy a large-screen TV, a new car, or an iced single
vente, seven-pump peppermint, caramel sauce top and bottom,
light-ice, no-whip mocha. Similarly, consumers in a recession
will likely cut back on travel and new technology.
Reasons for falls
Some companies, such as Apple and Google, may have seen
their stocks pull back because investors concluded that
they'd gotten ahead of themselves, in a wave of investor
euphoria. Such companies have been market darlings, after
all, boasting impressive profit margins and growth rates. For
example:
Company
5-Year Avg. Gross Margin
5-Year Avg. Revenue Growth Rate
Apple
33%
35%
Google
60% Continued... |