Friday, August 14, 2009
Pat Buchanan :: Townhall.com Columnist
Unwinnable War?
by Pat Buchanan
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 

"Taliban Are Winning: U.S. Commander in Afghanistan Warns of Rising Casualties." Thus ran the startling headline on the front-page of The Wall Street Journal. The lead paragraph ran thus:

"The Taliban have gained the upper hand in Afghanistan, the top American commander there said, forcing the U.S. to change its strategy in the eight-year-old conflict by increasing the number of troops in heavily populated areas like the volatile southern city of Kandahar, the insurgency's spiritual home."

Source for the story: Gen. Stanley McChrystal himself.

The general's spokesman in Kabul was swift to separate him from that headline and lead. They "go too far," he said: The general does not believe the Taliban are winning or "gaining the upper hand."

Nevertheless, in the eighth year of America's war, the newly arrived field commander concedes that U.S. casualties, now at record levels, will continue to be high or go higher, and that our primary mission is no longer to run down and kill Taliban but to defend the Afghan population.

What went wrong?

Though U.S. force levels are higher than ever, the U.S. military situation is worse than ever. Though President Karzai is expected to win re-election, he is regarded as the ineffectual head of a corrupt regime. Though we have trained an Afghan army and police force of 220,000, twice that number are now needed. The Taliban are operating not only in the east, but in the north and west, and are taking control of the capital of the south, Kandahar.

NATO's response to Obama's request for more troops has been pathetic.

Europeans want to draw down the troops already sent. And Western opinion has soured on the war.

A poll commissioned by The Independent found 52 percent of Britons wanting to pull out and 58 percent believing the war is "unwinnable."

U.S. polls, too, have turned upside down.

A CBS-New York Times survey in late July found 33 percent saying the war was going well and 57 percent saying it was going badly or very badly. In a CNN poll in early August, Americans, by 54 percent to 41 percent, said they oppose the Afghan war that almost all Americans favored after 9-11 and Obama said in 2008 was the right war for America to fight.

The president is now approaching a decision that may prove as fateful for him and his country as was the one made by Lyndon Johnson to send the Marines ashore at Da Nang in December 1965. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Pat Buchanan is a founding editor of The American Conservative magazine, and the author of many books including State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America .
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Pat Buchanan's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Gee, is this the same Pat Buchanan....
...who claimed that Iraq was an unwinnable quagmire? Now, that country is remarkably quiet.

This is not to say that Afghanistan will be a cakewalk. Contrary to the liberal Demunist claims that Iraq the "bad" war took away from Afghanistan the "good" war, the fact is that Iraq was always an easier task. Iraq has oil revenue and a mostly educated population while Afghanistan has neither.

Buchanan's pigheaded isolationism is tiresome. Would he prefer a Taliban regime remaining a safe haven for those who attack the United States?

My thoughts
I agreed with Pat then and now. I never saw Saddam as a grave threat to the US. Had he had WMD, what was he going to do with it? Saddam got a sample of US might in 1991 (and he knew it was only a sample). Saddam wanted to be left alone to control his own country and people. We should have focused most of our energy on bin laden early on in this thing and captured (or killed) him. US troops are not nation builders. We are war fighters and defenders of American freedom.

Scott G (post #26), well said. Islamic people don't think the same way we do. We cannot force democracy on somebody who does not want it.

I believe the best way to protect our nation is to remain vigilant within our own borders. If our intelligence agencies communicate and share information better, we can stave off any attempted attack on US soil before it can even get off the ground.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
The very best in financial advice from Dave Ramsey, Larry Kudlow, Motely Fool and many more plus Dilbert!