Once again,
Church & Dwight (NYSE: CHD) has proven
itself a
consumer-staples outlier, consistently delivering brisk
profit growth without stretching the balance sheet.
The owner of the Arm & Hammer, Orange Glo, and Trojan
brands, among other products, posted third-quarter sales of
$646.2 million, representing a 2.5% gain from the year-ago
period. Excluding currency movements and
acquisitions/divestitures, sales rose 5.7%. Both metrics show
growth from the
prior quarter.
Year over year, reported earnings per share swelled from
$0.69 to $0.98. The recent results, however, are artificially
bloated from a beneficial legal settlement that contributed
$0.17 per share.
That's not to say that Church & Dwight's underlying
profit performance was drab. Stripping out one-time items in
both quarters, EPS growth clocked in at nearly 18%. That
bottom-line strength beat analyst expectations, exceeded the
recent
EPS gain posted by competitor
Colgate-Palmolive (NYSE: CL), and trumped the
anemic showingfrom consumer-goods giant
Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG).
Church & Dwight's U.S. consumer segment, which
includes laundry products under the OxiClean and Arm &
Hammer names, was the standout performer. Sales increased
8.3%, helping to offset a currency-driven 7.6% sales decline
in the company's much smaller international unit.
The Specialty Products segment was also weak. The culprit
here was depressed U.S. milk prices, which drove down volumes
in the company's dairy-cow feed and nutrition business.
However, milk prices have recently shown signs of a bounce on
lower supply, and prices should eventually stabilize at
higher levels. At that point, Church & Dwight will likely
be back on top, while dairy-intensive businesses such as
Starbucks (Nasdaq: SBUX),
Yum! Brands (NYSE: YUM),
Nestle (OTC BB: NSRGY), and
Hershey (NYSE: HSY) potentially struggle with
costs.
Other noteworthy items from the quarter include a
gross-margin gain north of 4%, owing to lower commodity
costs, higher prices, and efficiency programs. Annoyingly,
management didn't release volume data, but
it did note that seven of the company's eight "power brands"
-- responsible for roughly 80% of net revenue -- enjoyed
sales and market share growth. That's up from six out of
eight in the prior quarter.
Ad spending again increased as a percentage of sales.
Frankly, it's just too soon to know whether we should view
this development as long-term brand building or fruitless
expenditure. For now, I'm inclined to cut management some
slack, given that operating margin widened on the whole.
Finally, net debt was down and free cash flow was up, both
by impressive amounts. As I previously speculated, the
significantly strengthened balance sheet has the company
hunting for
attractive acquisitions. Continued... |