Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Marybeth Hicks :: Townhall.com Columnist
Protecting the Parental Rights of "Dr. Mom"
by Marybeth Hicks
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 

“You’d better get over here,” the school secretary said. “Something’s up with Katie.”

“Something” turned out to be a post-tonsillectomy bleed that began 11 days after surgery. It continued on and off for four days and included two ambulance rides, several long nights in the emergency department and eventually, a 3 a.m. emergency surgery, a blood transfusion and a week in the hospital to recover.

Most families would look back and recall kindergarten. We look back and remember “Katie’s tonsillectomy.”

That was 15 years ago. There have been countless episodes before then and since involving my four children that brought me into the health care system to varying degrees. As any parent will attest, most of us mark time with medical stories, as in, “that was the summer Jimmy had staples in his head” and “that was the year Betsy had a stress fracture and couldn’t run.”

There is perhaps no greater certainty as a parent than the sure knowledge that over the course of your children’s young lives, you will spend hours with them in the waiting room of the pediatrician’s office or an urgent care center or the hospital emergency room.

You’re likely to become “Dr. Mom” or “Dr. Dad” as you learn all you must know to make wise decisions about your child’s health. Ultimately, no parenting task is more important or more serious than to monitor and maintain the health of our children.

Protecting children’s health is one supposed selling point to reforming health care. On the face of it, with potentially up to 10 percent of America’s children uninsured, this is one of the best reasons to overhaul aspects of our medical delivery system.

But HR 3200, the bill currently under consideration in the House, doesn’t simply help parents find the resources to pay for their children’s health care. It includes intrusive mechanisms to decide what that care ought to be. And despite promises that those of us who are happy with our private insurance can keep it, the fine print in this bill forces even private insurers to alter the care we may choose for our children. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Marybeth Hicks is the author of Bringing up Geeks: How to Protect Your Kid’s Childhood in a Grow-up-too-fast World (Penguin/Berkley, July 2008).
Lilly
Check this web site
http://edlabor.house.gov/documents/111/pdf/publications/AAH CA-BillText-071409.pdf

The government web site doesn't agree with your idea that the bill is not written yet. If you wanted to agrue that the bill was not final, you would be correct but you can't assume that everything that is now in the bill will be taken out. Page 16 states just what I said. The only way someone can get private insurance after the law takes effect is as a dependent of someone who had the insurance before the law was in effect. To state that what is now written in the bill is not passing rumors.

lilly, @ 8:04-- Exactly!
This fact is missed to mislead. Right wing pundits don't use common sense like normal people. Their agenda being the most important issue of the day, a pundit and right winger just goose steps in line with loud inane trash, over and over and over.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
The very best in financial advice from Dave Ramsey, Larry Kudlow, Motely Fool and many more plus Dilbert!