Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Marybeth Hicks :: Townhall.com Columnist
Realistic Family 'Ideals'
by Marybeth Hicks
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 

One of these days someone is finally going to trip and fall off the landing in front of the back door. There will be blood. Perhaps a concussion. But then at least one of my children will understand why I've nagged all these years about putting the shoes where they belong.

They belong in the baskets, clearly marked with the names of my four children - the baskets that sit conveniently on the shelves next to the door. Depositing a pair of shoes into a basket can be done in one fluid motion, taking no more effort than it would to bend over and pick up any object, say a pencil or a dollar bill.

I've tried everything I can think of to get my children to develop this habit short of actually tossing money out the door. I'm certain if I did this, my kids would snatch the cash and leave the shoes on the steps.

I guess I'm just unrealistic, but such is the curse of a parent.

Every mom and dad I know harbors a host of unrealistic expectations - a clean bedroom, a limited number of text messages, a job after graduation.

In fact, it strikes me that a perpetual state of unfounded optimism ought to be chief among the traits of every parent. Without it, we'd have to admit that all our admonitions and lectures and warnings and consequences are for naught because realistically, children won't listen.

New mom Bristol Palin, daughter of Alaska's Gov. Sarah Palin, in a recent interview with Fox News' Greta Van Susteren, made a case for realism in parenting. When asked her view on teen motherhood - specifically on the nature of the relationship that landed her in this difficult and life-changing role, Miss Palin said she thought her mother's views on abstinence were "unrealistic."

To be sure, Miss Palin made a sincere and compelling case for "waiting 10 years" to take on the responsibilities of parenthood. She repeated that the role, while rewarding and satisfying, is incredibly difficult. "There's nothing glamorous about it," she said, aptly pointing out that it's not the long, sleepless nights or the tasks of caring and feeding, but the fact that "you're no longer living for yourself. You're living for someone else."

That's a big realization for one so young. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Marybeth Hicks is the author of Bringing up Geeks: How to Protect Your Kid’s Childhood in a Grow-up-too-fast World (Penguin/Berkley, July 2008).
Jen
Jen you are right that I agree with you on the contraception and pretty much everything else. My point about education was it did not alter my values in the end because what I learned from home, church, and the Bible proved more compelling.

I wish society were more neutral, but it is not. It daily contradicts what I know to be true, so I must daily share truth with those I encounter especially my children. I try always to explain to those I know that just because they heard it on TV, or school, or read it some place does not make it true.

I guess I feel futile trying to change the world so I just try to hold true to what I believe, and hope that I can change those who I encounter by sharing my beliefs. I love http://www.answersingenesis.org.

christiancons

Christiancons: am not afraid of contraception my children are not going to turn into Mr. Hyde because some teacher tells them about barrier methods to prevent pregnancy and disease. I survived sex education with my Christian values intact.

Jen: Again, I don’t think you realize the ramifications of the “contraception mentality” and what it has led to. I encourage you to do a google search to better understand what I mean by that.

You say you survived sex ed with your Christian values intact. But if a major Christian value is knowledge of the intrinsic evil of contraception, then I’m not sure how intact your values are. I don’t mean to be arrogant, but if you believe the use of contraception is ok, then you don’t fully understand what God intended His gift to us of the marital act to be.

God intended for married couples to be open to life.

If we want to thwart or prevent the natural consequences of what might possibly occur in the sexual act as God designed it, then perhaps we shouldn’t be having sex (even if married). To say, Ok God, I would like to accept your gift of sex, but don’t really want to accept the possible conception part is a slap in the face to our creator. As if we know better than God?? Or as if His amazing gift to us needs a little tweaking???
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
The very best in financial advice from Dave Ramsey, Larry Kudlow, Motely Fool and many more plus Dilbert!