The "civil forum" featuring presidential candidates Barack Obama and John
McCain may not have been as exciting as Michael Phelps winning his eighth
Olympic gold medal, but it was civil and it was a forum from which emerged
useful information.
McCain had the most to gain. Judging by the applause, he won the night among
evangelical voters. He told them what they wanted to hear: He would be a
pro-life president with "pro-life policies." He believes the unborn have
human rights "from the moment of conception," that marriage is between a man
and a woman and that the California Supreme Court was wrong to strike down
the state's existing statutes, limiting marriage to opposite sex couples.
"I'm a federalist," he said, but added that if the federal courts start
forcing one state to accept rulings on same-sex "marriage" from another
state, he would then favor a constitutional amendment to define marriage as
between opposite sex couples. McCain said he would allow "contracts" between
same-sex couples.
McCain also gave the strongest answer on the theological concept of evil. He
said his approach to evil would be to "defeat it." Speaking of Osama bin
Laden, to get him he said, "I would follow him to the gates of hell," which
might be easier than following him to the mountains of Pakistan.
Asked to define "rich," McCain offered a mini-sermon, noting that "some of
the rich" are "the most unhappy," adding that he doesn't want to take from
the rich; rather he wants "everybody to get rich." He opposes
"redistribution" - a code word for higher taxes - proposes a $7,000 tax
credit for every child and health care choice. In contrast to Obama, McCain
said that spending is the reason for the deficit, not taxes that are too low
and he ridiculed a $3 million earmark to study the DNA of bears to
underscore his point.
Obama did himself some good among evangelicals by giving them the bottom
line for their faith: "I believe that Jesus Christ died for my sins and I am
redeemed through him. That is a source of strength and sustenance on a daily
basis."
Obama and others on the evangelical left see government, not individuals or
the church, as the instrument by which the commands of Jesus are
implemented. In such a doctrinal interpretation, government serves as a kind
of "lesser God," intruding on believers and their commission to do good
works, as a means of sharing the gospel message, and concentrating not on
the message, but on the implementation of the work itself, which only helps
in this life, not the next.
Obama's faith tells him nothing about human life (knowing when a baby
acquires human rights is "above my pay grade," he said).
Continued... |