Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Brent Bozell :: Townhall.com Columnist
Pittsburgh Protest Promoters
by Brent Bozell
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 

Radical-left protesters outside the G-20 summit meeting in Pittsburgh last week underlined once again that our friends in the news media see no real enemy or extremist to their left. But conservative protests against Team Obama are an ugly sign of incivility, and according to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, even impending violence.

HBO talk show host Bill Maher exemplified the liberal-media attitude on his Twitter page on Sept. 24: "Even with a face full of tear gas, these G-20 protesters (are) better looking than the teabaggers."

But there's a big difference between the sea of tens of thousands of conservative protesters in Washington on Sept. 12 and the 3,000 anti-capitalist radicals in Pittsburgh. The tone from the podium in Washington was happy and patriotic, which meant nothing to The Washington Post, which covered it as an outpouring of a "spectrum of conservative anger."

Arguing with Idiots By Glenn Beck

But in Pittsburgh, protesters on Sept. 24 assembled with no permit to march, and destroyed property on their route. On radical Pacifica Radio, they championed a guy calling himself Rev. Billy of the Church of Life After Shopping. He sounded like Nancy Pelosi's nightmare: " Some of us will go to jail today! We will take care of you! We will be there when you get out!" And then this: "Some of us may lose our lives today! We will respect you! You will be our heroes!"

No one heard this rant on national TV.

As usual, network reporters couldn't even place these fringe activists as "liberal," let alone far-left. On "The Early Show" on CBS, viewers could see wacky signs that read "No Bailouts, No Capitalism" and "No Borders, No Banks." But amazingly, reporter Susan Koeppen portrayed them as nonpartisan police ... victims. "Protesters have been hit with a massive police presence," she announced. "During the day, police set off pepper spray, forcing marchers and the media to flee." Koeppen mentioned in passing that the protesters had no permit, but she let the leftists run down the cops. "There is no freedom of speech in this country; there is no right to assemble!" claimed one. "These are all rights that have been violated today!"

Speaking of Nancy Pelosi, her old Democratic primary opponent Cindy Sheehan was outraged at the Pittsburgh police presence as well. She blogged: "Pittsburgh is what a police state looks like! ... We're like ants trying to struggle against anteaters. ... The cops and soldiers should be ashamed of themselves for allowing their selves to be used as tools of the Robber Class 'elites.'"

When Sheehan savaged George Bush, she was the darling of the major media. She was lovingly interviewed by Chris Matthews and he urged her to run for Congress. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Founder and President of the Media Research Center, Brent Bozell runs the largest media watchdog organization in America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Brent Bozell's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Liberal vs. Conservative
Reba writes, "If a conservative is a homosexual, they quietly enjoy their life. If a liberal is a homosexual, they loudly demand legislated respect."

Uh, NO, not quite. If a conservative is homosexual, he won't necessarily IDENTIFY as such, he may get married and father children to help advance his own political career, and he'll spout hypocritical anti-Gay positions ... but still enjoy engaging in furtive, anonymous sexual encounters with other men, usually at motels, roadside rest areas, and airport bathrooms.

Whereas if a liberal is homosexual, he will more like live his life openly, honestly, and with political integrity, and advocate equal treatment for all law-abiding, taxpaying citizens regardless of sexual orientation.

As for what you call "legislated respect," you and I both know there really is no such thing. No amount of legislation could coerce you into respecting anyone. Do you know anyone who is Gay? Do you know any longterm Gay couples? And if so, is it possible for you to respect the commitment they have made to each other?

Perhaps not. Perhaps no Gay person would get your respect. But the fact remains that there is simply no Constitutional justification for denying law-abiding Gay individuals and couples the very same legal benefits and responsibilities that Straight individuals and couples have always taken for granted.

Let's go back to your original statement, and simply change "homosexual" to "black." Perhaps you would say, "If a liberal is black, he will loudly demand his civil rights. If a conservative is black, he will be content to sit in the back of the bus."

the "fringe media"
I think that's an approprivate name because they no longer report news, they fabricate it to thier goofy notions...only the few that watch/listen to them will believe their false dogma while drinking the aid. What's more, how could Maher possibly have the guts to comment on anyone's looks or physical features...that is a skit for SNL if there ever was one!! He's one of the few 5' 2" men with a trunk on his face...come on!!
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
The very best in financial advice from Dave Ramsey, Larry Kudlow, Motely Fool and many more plus Dilbert!