Wednesday, October 07, 2009
Anders Bylund :: Townhall.com Columnist
How Google Stopped a Bidding War for
by Anders Bylund
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 

You think Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) paid too much for YouTube? Well, you're in good company: CEO Eric Schmidt knew all along that he was overpaying -- by a lot.

CNET News, a tech publication owned by CBS (NYSE: CBS), got hold of court documents from YouTube's long-running copyright battles with Viacom (NYSE: VIA). In these legal transcripts where Schmidt spoke under oath, you see the magnitude of Google's willingness to pay waymore for YouTube than the company was worth.

The video-sharing site was worth no more than $700 million when Google launched its $1.65 billion offer, by Schmidt's own estimate. But YouTube was -- and still is -- a fast-growing phenomenon that draws millions of eyeballs every day, and the unrealized potential to make money and control online traffic patterns was worth an extra $1 billion.

Schmidt explained that extraordinary circumstances demanded extraordinary measures. "In the deal dynamics, the price is not set by my judgment or by financial model or discounted cash flow," he said. "It's set by what people are willing to pay. And we ultimately concluded that $1.65 billion included a premium for moving quickly and making sure that we could participate in the user success in YouTube."

In other words, that extra billion kept YouTube out of the hands of Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO), Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT), and possibly other companies with ambitions of online dominance. News Corp. (NYSE: NWS) had recently paid $580 million for social media site MySpace, and other media giants might have had their eyes on YouTube. If Google hadn't made this serious commitment right away, we might have seen a multi-party bidding war erupt -- and YouTube might have been a Disney (NYSE: DIS) property today, for all we know. Stranger things have happened.

Some might say that Google has yet to figure out how to make money from this expensive acquisition, but I respectfully disagreefor a numberof reasons. YouTube was a smart buy for Google -- if you take a suitably long viewof the investment.

Which side do you take, dear Fool? Share your views in the comments below.

This article was originally published as How Google Stopped a Bidding War for YouTubeon Fool.com

Copyright © 2009 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Anders Bylund is a Motley Fool contributor.

Be the first to read Anders Bylund's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
The very best in financial advice from Dave Ramsey, Larry Kudlow, Motely Fool and many more plus Dilbert!