Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Alex Dumortier,CFA :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Market Is 40% Overvalued
by Alex Dumortier,CFA
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 

That's what economist Andrew Smithers wrote in his most recent report to clients. Dismissing this tidbit out of hand could be costly. In Valuing Wall Street, published in March 2000, Smithers warned investors that the U.S. stock market was dramatically overvalued; over the next three years, the S&P 500 lost more than 40% of its value. In an article published on March 23rd this year, Smithers told the Financial Times, "We're not a long way short from really, really good value." The rally off the March 9 low is evidence that his assessment was again correct.

40% overvalued -- based on what?
On October 12th, with the S&P 500 near its current level, I wrote that the market was overvalued by 16%. I based this on an analysis of the cyclically adjusted P/E multiple (CAPE), which uses a moving average of 10-year inflation-adjusted earnings.

Smithers looked at the S&P 500's CAPE also, but some technical differences in his calculations lead him to conclude the degree of overvaluation is closer to 40%. Because he's spent a lot more time thinking about the CAPE than I have, I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. Furthermore, he finds that Tobin's qratio, which compares the market value of equities against their net worth at replacement cost, highlights a similar level of overvaluation.

" Expensive markets give low returns "
If stocks are overvalued to this degree – and there is good reason to believe they are -- investors should expect mediocre long-term returns. Certainly, there is little reason to expect permanently higher earnings growth (rather the contrary) that would compensate for the CAPE's downward reversion to its long-term average.

Consequently, value-oriented asset manager GMO estimates that large-cap stocks will return just 2.3% after inflation over the next seven years ... less than half the long-term historical U.S. equity return (6.5%).

The difference between March 2000 and October 2009
The breadth of market overvaluation in March 2000 was extraordinary. Today, the U.S. market still contains some pockets of value -- notably, high-quality companies, as exemplified by the Dow Jones Industrial Average:

Dow Jones Industrial Average

Cyclically Adjusted P/E Multiple (CAPE)

CAPE / CAPE Historical Average

March 2000 - Average

36.8

221%

September 2009 - Average

18.7

105%

Source: Author's calculations based on data from Dow Jones and Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.

A subset of stocks that were part of the index then and now tells the same story:

Stock

Price-to-Earnings Multiple

(Trailing-12-Months' Earnings) March 31, 2000

Price-to-Earnings Multiple

(Trailing-12-Months' Earnings) October 26, 2009

Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG)

21.9

15.9

Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT)

67.3

18.6

Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT) Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Alex Dumortier, CFA, is a Motley Fool Contributor.

Be the first to read Alex Dumortier's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
The very best in financial advice from Dave Ramsey, Larry Kudlow, Motely Fool and many more plus Dilbert!